« June 2006 | Main | August 2006 »

July 31, 2006

Re-Post: The Long Tail & The Rise of the "Conversationista"

I am going to travel from Boston to San Francisco and back in the next 24 hours, so posting this week will probably be light --- since I'll probably be light-headed, laggy & yea, maybe grumpy.  Which makes this an opportune time for some RE-POSTS.  Here's some bloggy brilliance from way back before you were a loyal reader...

Originally posted in August 2005, some of the ideas discussed below are just now starting to bubble up in practice and in conversation, spurred by the recent publication of Chris Anderson's LONG TAIL tome.  Part 1 sets up the concept of the Long Tail in a PR practice.  Part 2, tomorrow, will provide some ideas on "how-to" implement a Long Tail approach to agency work... 

Ideas are just starting to coalesce about the potential impact of "social" Internet technologies (e.g., blogs, vlogs, wikis, search engines and recommendation engines, etc.) on the craft of PR. In a prior post, almost a year ago now, I commented on "Blogging as Social Cartography." Here's a relevant, paraphrased passage from that Sept. 2004 entry:

"...Tomorrow's marketers need to start thinking about how to influence the blogosphere. For example...a newly-published author might gain as much promotional heft from 'guest blogging' in influential forums as they would by touring your local BORDERS store. Further - and intriguingly - the blogs need not be 'the biggies': the blogosphere is so self-referential that the splash made at a relatively inconsequential blog might create worthwhile ripples throughout the wider Web world."

In retrospect, these types of ideas seem to presage the growing interest in the "Long Tail.”

In a nutshell (and I hope I do it justice), the Long Tail premise suggests that there is as-much or more $$$ to be made in a digital economy by the sale of "misses" as "hits." With no inventory costs or geographic limitations, a digital retailer can make plenty of money by selling the umpteen #s of obscure CDs, DVDs and books that would otherwise fade away to umpteen cult/niche consumers. In fact these retailers might make more money on the “Long Tail” titles than they could make subsisting on the sales of popular blockbusters.

Importantly, these "offbeat" audiences can be created on the fly via recommendation engines and/or niche-oriented search engines: the example given by Wired's Chris Anderson shows how a typical teenager interested in downloading a Britney Spears song can be led via recommendation engines (like Amazon’s “Customers Who Bought X Also Bought Y”) to try out more obscure but like-minded artists.

This part is intriguing to me. There are those of us who pride ourselves on being offbeat; who disdain the "keeping up with the iPods" mentality of popular culture. But the emerging social-orientation of Internet applications can reveal to each one of us how "niche" we can be, once we are exposed to what's available all along the Long Tail.

And this applies not only to entertainment products but to other aspects of culture. Since the Blogging Boom began, how many hours have you "wasted" reading the blogs of lonely housewives, American soldiers posted in Iraq, Brazilian teenagers...?  If you've aimlessly blog-surfed like this, you've stroked the Long Tail. And if you've checked out other PR-related blogs, you've similarly proven the premise: each of us is a micro-audience.

How will this affect PR? A taste of what's to come can be found in places ranging from PR WEEK to Mediapost. Still, there are more questions than answers: what's to be done about the Big Bang-sized fragmentation of our audiences?

The PR industry is notoriously bad at “scaling;” it seems each new account creates the need for a new Account Exec. How the heck can we afford to keep tabs (much less influence) a 24x7 conversation with multiple millions of individual consumers?

My guess is that we’ll adopt a hybrid approach, in which account teams continue to try to influence “old world” media and “strategic” blogs, as well as those growing numbers of niche-oriented blog aggregator sites. Meanwhile, we’ll develop “contextual strike teams” … The members of this class of “conversationistas” will be culled from across the agency, tasked with participating in ongoing dialogues in blogs, wikis, vlogs, et cetera, ad infinitum, not as PR people so much as “genuinely interested consumers.”

In this brave new world, though, folks, there’s no faking it. You can’t ask a 40-something, outdoorsy VP to participate in an ongoing rant session on a discussion board devoted to massively-multiplayer online role-playing games. You’ll hire a whipsmart college intern for that. The VP in this case will be deployed to discuss the pros-and-cons of camping gear and local campsites, across a dozen different Outdoor Enthusiast blogs, for the hiking-boot division of the agency’s footwear client.

Meanwhile, the 30-something AE who runs marathons in her spare time will perform similar tasks for the footwear client’s running shoe group; she’ll discuss her training regimen and share tales of her past races in forums devoted to fitness, running, etc.

Yes, as an agency owner this gives rise to questions about efficiency and scalability: which blogs are important? How many hours can be devoted to such activities? How can we measure success? But this is the lesson of the Long Tail: they are ALL important! Every single itty-bitty one of ‘em. You can influence a hundred “Influencers” who can in turn influence millions of consumers.

So, BusinessWeek, etc., will still be important. BUT, you can simultaneously influence a few hundred more “non-influencers” (a.k.a. Joe Average) – maybe thousands! – who will in turn influence a few more Joe Averages, and so on…

And as for “scalability” – there’s a hidden beauty here. Maybe that 40-something outdoorsman in the corner office isn’t specifically assigned to the Hiking Boots Division of the footwear client…but there’s some likelihood that he is participating in those outdoorsman forums ANYWAY. Probably feeling a li’l guilty about it.  But, if we encourage each of our employees to be conversationistas-with-a-purpose, we can LEVERAGE their EXISTING interests to influence their TRUE peers: they’ll engage as welcome participants in communities based on the context of their genuine interests! Part of their jobs will be to participate in their hobbies – they’ll love it, they'll work hard at it. And yes, mistakes will be made, but ultimately the clients will love the results.

Tags: , , , ,

L-O-S-E-R

L O S E R

I just saw today that our humble PR Squared blog lost out to the Matthew Podboy's Active Voice blog in the MarketingSherpa Best-of-the-Blogs survey.  Congratulations, Matt!  We'll be gunnin' fer ya next year!

July 28, 2006

Billion-Dollar Social Media Pioneers!

In case anyone doubted the prospect of billion-dollar corporations embracing PR 2.0 tactics, witness today's announcement by Novell. The company has launched a major league initiative with the debut of SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 --- it's the first enterprise-grade desktop-to-datacenter Linux suite, and just 10 days post-launch some element of this product line has been downloaded every 5 seconds, on average.

Novell is a new client of SHIFT Communications, and we're obviously excited by the media reception gained by the SUSE products thus far. We created a del.icio.us page to keep tabs of "the good stuff" and were delighted when Novell CMO John Dragoon opted to include a link to the del.icio.us site in today's announcement. We'll continue to post articles about SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 from Novell on an on-going basis: fans of this exciting product line can use the del.icio.us page (or its RSS feed) to keep tabs on Novell's progress ...

  • In fact, I envision a day when an IT director uses this site as part of the research they'll need to motivate a large-scale Linux migration. They'll print out articles like this, and this, that they find on the del.icio.us site, as fodder for a "Linux Adoption Proposal" to their CIO.
  • I envision a day when the CMOs of every major company turn to their PR team and ask, "Is it possible to tag all of the articles about our company and industry, to make it easy for the Sales team to mix, match & customize their research for a proposal?"
  • I envision a day when "PR 2.0" is "business as usual," and --- you can call me a suck-up if you want to --- I sincerely applaud Novell for having the guts to pave the way.

It would have been all too easy for Novell to suggest that we only post the SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 coverage to the corporate website: that's the kind of Big Company thinking we'd expected. Instead, Novell's marketing team said something like this; we said something like this ... and they still decided to put their trust in Social Media.

That's how change happens.

Tags: , , , , ,

July 27, 2006

Old Mistakes will Continue to be Made (But Now will be Blogged About)

I am sure my esteemed colleagues at the BadPitch Blog are gonna be all over this, but I couldn't help posting about this example of the bad practices that will continue to haunt the PR industry.

Mistakes are made in every industry, but it is incumbent on PR practitioners to be ever more diligent, since our "customers" --- the media --- wield word processors, and an audience of millions. That's been the case for decades, of course, but in the era of Social Media our errors are more likely to be transparent. The blogger has lower editorial barriers to ranting.

Tags: , , ,

(New) Mistakes will be Made

My dirty little PR 2.0 secret? I just love being able to shrug my shoulders and say, "I think it might work, but you know, it might not. Wanna try it and see?"

I've often told clients that one of the things they pay a firm for is its expertise, which is just another way of saying, "You get to learn from all the mistakes we've already made."

In the PR 2.0 area, though, you get to be more honest about the fact that it's a wild & woolly new world, and so, new mistakes will be made.

As the inimitable Jeremy Pepper of POP! PR Jots recently noted (in his trademark style):

"I am not an expert (on blogging). And, if anyone calls himself or herself an expert in blogging to you, run. Well, first spit at them, and then run. There are no experts, just people that are learning but began a couple years earlier (or later) than others..."

True 'dat.

July 25, 2006

SHIFT Releases "PR 2.0 Essentials" Guidebook

Today we're publishing a new e-book (available here) for PR pros and corporate marketers who seek to get up to speed on all this "2.0" stuff.

It's likely that if you read this blog, the content of the e-book will be old-hat to you. However, you might have colleagues or clients who are still coming to grips with Social Media, in which case I'd encourage you to point them our way.

As with our Social Media News Release template, we're releasing this e-book with no copyright protections. If you want to cut&paste the material into an e-book or memo or proposal all your own, go for it. We're big believers in karma over here.

Note that the subtitle of this e-book is, "A Necessarily Living Document." That's a fancy way of saying, "This stuff changes by the day, and, we've surely missed something already." If you have comments, please leave 'em here at the blog. If you have suggestions for a next rev, please drop 'em here.

Tags: , , , ,

July 24, 2006

Bullets Over Bullshit

Just another post about the Social Media News Release, folks. On this outing we'll discuss "Bullets vs. B.S." Specifically, we'll answer the question, "Why does the Social Media News Release use bulleted 'news facts' instead of the standard PR malarkey?"

First: there's no official reason for replacing that ol' PR malarkey. The use of bulleted "news facts" vs. the standard PR text, in my opinion, is NOT one of the central tenets of the Social Media News Release.

I like the bulleted news facts for the simple reason that, if we have the opportunity re-invent the Press Release, let's make it simpler to understand for ALL readers. People (and especially reporters) are busy. They like it when you get to the point. People tend to skip malarkey and look for the bullet-points, anyway; they seek out succinct, straightforward information.

Still, many PR pros prefer the use of malarkey: they like to see the PR text pasted verbatim into a "legitimate" article. Because many reporters (especially at smaller publications) are busy, this happens fairly often and the wise PR professional never complains when an article appears that is 100% "on message."

Personally I don't like when this happens --- to me it is a sign of editorial laziness. I'd prefer that the reporter take the time, if possible, to analyze a client's news vs. paste it whole-cloth into their journal. Certainly, most bloggers who take the time to post about a company are more likely to add their two cents than to cut & paste some PR malarkey into their blog. They're more likely to ridicule our PR malarkey than regurgitate it without further comment.

But use the malarkey if you care to; it certainly does not preclude the installation of a "Digg" button and Technorati Tags, etc., in your Social Media News Release. Go for it. To me, the only "central tenet" of the Social Media News Release is that there are no central tenets. There are no rules.

Tags: , , , , , ,

July 21, 2006

Social Media Release Podcast

Today I was happily engaged in a chat with Shel Holtz, Chris Heuer, and Tom Foremski about the Social Media News Release, and follow-on reactions to its debut.

The conversation was captured for a podcast which you can find here. (But hopefully you have better things to do with your weekend. Wait 'til Monday!)

Meanwhile, please take a sec to subscribe to the New Media Release podcast RSS feed. It will be worth it.

Tags: , , , , ,

July 20, 2006

Clients & Currency

Recently we were asked to meet our client's new ad agency, to brief them on what we'd been up to in terms of messaging, market reception, etc. It was a good session; lots of give-and-take, lots of brainstorming. Then, the bill came due. Our client got an invoice from the ad guys for something like $2K, just for that 2-hour meeting.

You do not build currency with clients if "currency" is your first priority.

That's the problem with the "Time & Materials" model favored by most professional services companies: no one likes the feeling of being nickel-and-dimed. As a client, how can you be free-thinking and creative, how can you build a lasting partnership, if you know "the meter is running" whenever you interact with your agency team?

We favor the retainer model --- we charge a flat fee, month over month. We talk about "budget" with our clients on an annual basis, not every month as our T&M peers need to do. When we over-service our accounts (which happens routinely), we keep our mouths shut. By the same token, when we've undershot the month's billings (rare), we don't expect a call from an angry client. It tends to even-out within the 12-month contract term.

There's a reason that idioms like "Don't be penny-wise but pound-foolish" come into existence. It's been my experience that if you stop sweating about every penny, you tend to build lasting "currency" as a favored partner.

July 18, 2006

New Media Releases, Digg & the "Meritocracy of Media"

One of the least-understood or discussed elements of the New Media Release was the inclusion of the Digg "button." Here's the idea:

Each New Media Release should be able to stand on its own as a source of content; thus it could be as relevant as an article in the mainstream media. For example, if Intel releases news about an upcoming microchip, there are lots of people ranging from business reporters to engineers to bloggers who would likely be very interested. Similarly, if Martha Stewart put out an announcement about a "to-die-for" new recipe, there would be a population segment who'd be just as rabidly interested.

Whether or not a "traditional" reporter or a blogger decided to write about the Intel chip or Martha Stewart recipe, the New Media Releases would still exist in cyberspace, infinitely "findable" to the layperson via a simple Google search on terms ranging from "semiconductors" to "recipes."

In the Olden Days (say, 6 months ago), these laypeople might find the news, use it for their own purposes, email it to friends, etc. --- but ultimately any news release that did not pique the interest of a journalist or top blogger would soon perish.

But with services like Digg, Newsvine, the new Netscape, et al., a layperson who likes a piece of content --- whether an article or a news release --- can "vote" for it and in doing so expose the content to thousands of other people who might otherwise never have seen it. The News Release can become a user-promoted News Story.

And lo' --- any content that rises through the ranks of a service like Digg can become truly newsworthy, i.e., to the mainstream reporter who might have otherwise ignored it. This tidbit from MediaPost speaks to the potential:

"While Digg is far from a mega-mainstream Web destination, it has disproportionate influence on search-engine results and blog memes ... Moreover, Digg's tendency to periodically extend beyond its core audience by uncovering and virally launching niche content into the mainstream is certainly compelling."

Everyone (myself included) talks about the democratization of media, i.e., anyone can be an author. Services like Digg represent the "Meritocracy of Media," i.e., anyone can be an editor.

Tags: , , , , , ,

July 15, 2006

My Top 5 Social Media Tools

Damn, snagged in another meme. How can I get any work done? I'll get you for this, Stuart Bruce. ;)

My top 5 Social Media tools these days...

  • del.icio.us - one way for PR pros to become more valuable to the media: do the research for them.
  • Qumana - a decent blog editor. Pretty much any blog editor rocks after 2 years dealing with Blogger.
  • Blogger Web Comments & Technorati This (tie) - I use these all the time to see what's been said about whatever page I am visiting. Interestingly, each seems to pick up different posts from across the blogosphere, so this is a true tie: I need both and use them equally. (Which kinda sucks, by the way.)
  • NewsGator for Outlook - Am I "Old School" because I still like my good ol' corporate email? Downside: glitchy. Crashes Outlook quite often.
  • toread - If you did not answer "yes" to the "Old School" question above, then you will now: this tool automatically sends the page you're visiting to your email account, so you can read it later. Hat-tip to Rubel for this one.

Most looking forward to checking out: FeedYes. Apparently it allows you to set up an RSS feed for any webpage, so you're alerted whenever it changes. (Then again, I already have too many RSS feeds!)

Tag, you're it: Kami Huyse, Andrea Weckerle, Chris Heuer, David Meerman Scott, Shel Holtz.

Tags: , , ,

July 14, 2006

Bigger Ain't Better

Kudos to Steven Cody, a managing partner at Peppercom, for his Op-Ed in today's "Daily Dog" e-newsletter. Steven rants --- imaginatively & accurately --- about the ways in which smaller PR agencies are simply better than the Big Boys.

Among other attributes, Steven points out that smaller agencies are better risk-takers, innovators and collaborators.

Bravo!

July 11, 2006

Daily Servings of del.icio.us Delights

I can now share an example of how you can use a social bookmarking tool like del.icio.us to enhance relationships with media, analysts & bloggers, even on a daily basis. I first talked about this in the "Pitching 2.0" post. Here's a real-world variation on the approach discussed there ...

For our client, BzzAgent, we've set up a del.icio.us page that keeps tabs on the daily flow of news in their industry (Word of Mouth Marketing, a.k.a. WOMM). WOMM is a fast-growing, somewhat controversial arena that generates a lot of coverage; not all of it positive. There is a lot of education that needs to happen on an on-going basis. Thus, our opportunity...

  • Some of the articles are about BzzAgent, but, many are not. This del.icio.us page is about the WOMM industry, not BzzAgent specifically.
  • We're tagging the top 5-10 articles per week, and including commentary on each article from BzzAgent officials, including the company's renowned founder and CEO, Dave Balter.
  • In addition to standard tags such as "author name" and "publication name" we're also tagging each article as "WOMgood" or "WOMbad" to designate the tonality of each write-up.
  • The BzzAgent commentary and the distinction of "WOMgood" or "WOMbad" are subjective, opinionated: this is intended to shine a light on the WOM industry's daily happenings, as seen through the BzzAgent filter.
  • As this page begins to fill-up, we'll be asking many top reporters to subscribe to the RSS feed, for a "daily dose of Bzz," i.e.,
    • "Keep tabs on the Word-of-Mouth industry at the same pace as BzzAgent's execs, and get their first-hand take on each article..."
    • "Whether you agree with BzzAgent's opinions or not, you can use the WOMgood or WOMbad tags to get a pre-filtered look at the best and worst of external opinions on this high-growth industry, to facilitate your own research..."
    • "...And let us know if these BzzAgent opinions on these articles motivate you to want to draft your own article, to dive deeper into any given topic..."

What are we doing here? Providing any writer who is interested in WOMM with a customized research page containing the top news in the space, including first-hand reaction --- on a daily basis --- by a WOMM industry pioneer. For media types, et al., who subscribe to the RSS feed of that del.icio.us page, that's a daily dose of Thought Leadership!

Tags: wom, womma, bzzagent, pr+2.0, pr, public+relations, marketing, social+bookmarking

July 10, 2006

5 Simple Rules for Avoiding Piggishness

It took 5 years but the PR industry is finally back in a position where there is more opportunity than we can handle. The "supply and demand" process is a miracle to watch. We are literally forced to use the price point as a means to control the flow of new business. Still, it's a horrible feeling to have to turn away business, when for so long we were all desperate for any sales lead.

The last time this situation occurred, the PR industry grew too greedy for its own good. I believe that the greed of PR executives during the "dot-com" days resulted in a squandered opportunity to cement PR's emergent role in the marketing budget. Granted, we were just one of many outstretched palms in those heady days, but, by charging outsized fees we helped force the entrepreneurs we served to take more money from VCs than they needed (or deserved).

With a similar opportunity now at-hand, the PR industry must be diligent about "Opportunity Management." Here are 5 simple rules we follow...

  1. Return every phone call and email in a timely fashion.
  2. If you can't help someone out, offer up the name of someone else who can. Every single time, and no matter what they need (within reason, of course).
  3. Don't charge more money than you genuinely deserve to earn. If you rough-out a "Scope of Work" document for one client at $10K per month, don't use that same document to charge a bigger client $40K per month.
  4. Never make an "opportunity to invest" part of your reason for taking on a client. Never allow an investment in a client to cloud your advice about PR nor your judgment around how you run your own business.
  5. If the agency account managers squawk about being too busy to take on another account: listen to them.

Special note to agency principals: this sounds sanctimonious and preachy (sorry), but for all of our sakes, now is not the time to be licking our piggy chops as we approach the trough again. Let's focus on continuing to provide the substantive services we've been offering throughout our darker days. And let's be thoughtful about waging a talent war: pay too much for the people and we'll be forced to charge too much to the clients. ... And the cycle that ended so badly last time will have begun anew!

July 07, 2006

Clueless

That BusinessWeek article has been a mixed blessing (mostly good). On the plus side, it's opened some interesting doors and conversations with companies and people I'd never have expected.

On the downside, I field many calls from folks who "just don't get it."

  • Here's a sampling of questions I've had to answer recently:
  • "What is a blogger?"
  • "Why should we care about these bloggers?"
  • "What is PR Newswire?"
  • "How do you send out a press release?"
  • "What is Technorati/Digg/a tag/a podcast/a vlog/etc.?"
  • "Why did you make this a pdf? I can't fill in the blanks?"
  • "What is a pdf?"
  • "Don't reporters like it when you send them press releases, with lots of graphics attached, without asking first?"

So - to those of you (and there were many) who suggested that the Social Media Press Release, PR 2.0, etc. were too bleeding edge for the mainstream... You were right. Luckily I have always acknowledged as much.

July 06, 2006

UPDATE: How Many Downloads of the Social Media PR Template?

7 speed limit sign 0 O zero

So far...

Tags: , , ,

101 Posts to "Purpose-Built" del.icio.us Page

1 zero 1

Yesterday marked the addition of the 101st post to our "purpose-built" del.icio.us page. This page keeps tabs on the evolution of the Social Media Press Release template that SHIFT launched in late May.

The earliest posts were "self-referential;" that is, they were mostly links to related topics that I'd already covered, and to Tom Foremski's original rant, etc.

In the ensuing weeks, I (obsessively) used the "Techorati This" feature of my Firefox browser to see new commentary via daily searches on the template itself (the pdf file), on SHIFT's website, and on the blog. Hitting the 101st post milestone feels like a real achievement.

If you opt to visit the del.icio.us page, feel free to explore it in a "tag-wise" fashion. Want to see the negative reactions (9 out of 101)? Click the "negative" tag. Curious about the reaction of your favorite PR blogger? Look for their last name in the tags.

For this particular initiative, we did NOT use the del.icio.us page as envisioned in the "Pitching 2.0" post. Because this page is intended to merely COLLECT links rather than serve as a customized RESEARCH page, I don't use this del.icio.us page as an example of how to use social bookmarking to serve as a "steward of the storyline." (I chose to mostly use excerpts of relevant blog posts, to give visitors a taste of the tonality of the reactions. If I had to do it all over again, I'd explain why each post was worthy of your click.)

Let's use this milestone to reiterate a central tenet: PR 2.0 is not JUST about the newfangled press release. It's not JUST about del.icio.us. In fact, it's not even about Technology. It's about using Social Media TOOLS to facilitate interaction with both traditional journalists and bloggers...

Tags: , , ,

July 05, 2006

Social Media Press Release Catching Fire

Social Media waits for no one.  I returned from a quick vacation to see major developments for the Social Media Press Release.  Both were hugely gratifying and momentous in their own way...

First thing I saw was a press release put out by PRWeb with the Batmanesque title, "Holy SHIFT! PRWeb Plays Tag with Social Media."  In the announcement, PRWeb CEO David McInnis notes, "If you spend the time to create a press release following the template outlined by SHIFT Communications, all you have is an electronic document unless you have a distribution platform that supports its features. PRWeb is that platform."

Although I am not in cahoots or even in communication with PRWeb, the guy has a point.  SHIFT's template is just a guide.  As noted in an earlier post, the wire services have, to-date, been slow to adopt new technology standards for the Web 2.0 era, and their support represents a critical facet to the long-term adoption of the Social Media Press Release concept.

I still need to dig deeper into PRWeb's claims but I admit to being intrigued by their list of newly-announced features. In particular, it's the low-tech stuff that now interests me, e.g.:

"A new Technorati tagging widget has been incorporated into the (PRWeb) press release submission form, thereby streamlining the process of creating Technorati tags.  (Also,) the user interface includes a Tag Suggestion utility that analyzes press release content to facilitate the automatic generation of effective tags that match press release content and keyword density." 

Little touches will make all the difference in making this format more digestible to all comers.

The 2nd thing to catch my eye were the posts by Tom Foremski and Fleishman-Hillard's Chris Heuer about their effort to standardize the template for all PR pros.  Tom wisely notes:

"The PR companies are very competitive and won't take the lead from each other and so we will end up with a tower of babel of different labels/tags and different formats, and we won't be much better off than before."

His idea is to provide a "neutral platform" (via a Google Group) which will be led by Chris Heuer, where PR people can congregate to discuss/debate the format.  (Constantin Basturea provides a helpful link via his excellent NewPR Wiki --- which is where I originally suggested such a dialogue take place.)  I will join this group and add whatever value I can.

Tom's right that it might be tough to get PR agencies to collaborate, but I am hopeful that even if this particular effort does not gain traction, wire services like PRWeb, BusinessWire and PRNewswire will help lead the way, spurred by the PR industry's obvious interest in leveraging Social Media to tell better stories.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Subscribe






Check out the latest videos about Social Media Marketing


Grab this swicki from eurekster.com



Alltop, all the top stories
>br />
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
Clicky Web Analytics