« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 31, 2007

Hugh MacLeod is Hilarious & Insightful

Control the conversation-notI know that I am not the first to realize it, but this guy just rocks. 

The tyrrany of the righteous, laid bare, made funny.

 

 

 

When I saw this cartoon today, I sputtered with laughter.  Coffee dang near spewed out of my nose.

(And if you’ve ever seen my nose up close, you’ve now got all the Halloween imagery you need to be very, very afraid.)

October 30, 2007

Guest Post: Should All Releases Have Disclaimers on “Intent to Promote a Product?”

The following post was written by our own Chris Iafolla, in Boston.  It was originally published at our staff blog, UnSpun.  I tweeted it tonight and got some supportive comments back… and since I am going to be out o’ pocket tomorrow, I thought I’d post Chris’s words here.  If thoughtful & compelling content like this doesn’t getcha’ to check out our UnSpun blog, I dunno what will!

Here’s Chris …

Row1-2After reading Tom Foremski’s post suggesting that all press releases be marked “Not to Be Distributed by News Aggregators” I hesitated to write this post, because my initial reaction was driven by emotion and not rational thought.  After sitting on it for almost a week, I found that many of my initial thoughts still persisted.

Let me start off by saying that I respect Tom Foremski.  Some of his posts have led to important changes in the PR industry.  In addition, I don’t think Tom believes that all PR people are out to deceive or manipulate the system.  That being said, I think he might have overstepped his bounds a little bit on this one.

First, let’s look at Tom’s underlying message that journalists are independent, objective reporters of the news.  This is certainly the intent of a free press in a democratic nation, but I think most of us can agree it is not the outcome.  You mean to tell me that the New York Times is not a liberal slanted paper, and the Wall Street Journal is not a conservative slanted paper?  Taking a leap of faith and calling the stories of journalists unbiased would be an injustice.

Now that I got that off my chest, down to the PR part of this.

There is a sweeping assumption made here that all PR people are out to deceive—plain not true.  Are advertisers required to put a statement across the front of their ads saying this information is intended to promote the products of XYZ company?  In most cases: no.  Discerning people understand the dynamic at play.  And aren't we already disclosing the source of the content?  Content written by a journalist has a byline from a journalist.  Company press releases are marked as such, and have company and PR contacts listed.  Is this not transparency?  My other issue with Tom’s post is the idea that press releases are not news.  If a journalist writes a story based on my client’s announcement in a press release, how is that not news?  It may not be the same “spin” (yes, journalists spin too) that a reporter might put on it, but it is the story my client believes is important to the industry.

I do appreciate the need to uphold ethical business practices.  But, Tom's intended goal (in his own words) is to "allow people to make their own judgment on the quality of the content."   By putting a disclaimer across the top that says our purpose is to promote a product, are we not cheapening the message contained in that release?  In effect, we would be removing any hope of allowing a consumer to judge the quality of the content because we are telling them up front that we have a hidden agenda.

 

Rundown By Luke Armour

Fa15b04c-7231-4290-abfa-bb9c86f17b94TheRundownI’ll be interviewed by the bright & funny Luke Armour at 1:30pm ET today, on BlogTalkRadio

Luke sends me, by far, some of the funniest emails so I am looking forward to a good laugh.

According to Luke we’ll be discussing “the social media press release, the state of public relations and life on both U.S. coasts.”  All topics worthy of a good laugh, depending on whom you ask. 

October 29, 2007

Snackdaddy

IStock_000003843518XSmallGeoff Livingston tagged me to participate in Jeremiah Owyang’s “media snack” meme. 

Jeremiah asks:  “Do you respect media snackers? … folks who consume small bits of information, data or entertainment when, where and how they want?  If you want to be part of their lives you’ve got to respect them…”

How I respect the mediasnackers:

  • I microblog at twitter.com/TDefren.  Random bits of news, commentary, jokes, etc.
  • More often than not, I try to keep my posts here at PR-Squared to a 2–minute read.  Yes, I’ve “timed” this more than once.
  • I try not to post more than 2 – 3X a week.  I ain’t brilliant enough to do this daily.  Also, I use more paragraph breaks (and bullet points) than necessary, to trick your eyes into thinking that this’ll be a quickie read!  
  • I don’t vlog or podcast.  Call me a Luddite but I am too much of a mediasnacker myself to find time to watch 2–minute videos or listen to podcasts!  Too much of a time commitment.  And so since I rarely consume such material myself, I figure my audience is just as busy and distracted, so I don’t go there. 

I think of myself as more of a grazer than a snacker.  While it’s true I avoid pod– and videocasts, I am a voracious reader.  Every morning I sniff through the RSS feeds, looking for tasty morsels.  Length is unimportant; I am more interested in what I can learn.  Sometimes I learn more from a long, thoughtful post (so don’t sweat keeping those blog posts “tight and concise,” Jeremiah!) … It’s gotten to a point where I can barely start my workday until 10:30am because I’ve spent 90 minutes catching up on the blogosphere!  That’s not snacking – that’s grazing, fer shure.

This is the part where I tag some other folks for the meme.  How about Todd VanHoosear, ToddAnd (just to get all the Todd’s-of-the-Blogs covered in one fell swoop), and, Brian Solis, Kate Trgovac, Chris Lynn and Joseph Thornley?

October 26, 2007

More Reasons to Participate @ PR-Squared

IStock_000004160101XSmallThe PR-Squared blog will be overhauled in the very near future. 

Part of the makeover is already in place:

My tech guy removed the “no follow” and “redirect” when it comes to leaving your comments at the blog. 

(Don’t ask me why we didn’t do this 4 years ago.  No clue.  Not my area.)

So, now when you include a URL in your comment (associated with your name), it will “count” as a link from PR-Squared to your own site, in Technorati, et al.  

So join in the fun!  Don’t just lurk!  Sound off & reap the rewards of participation (and linklove).

October 25, 2007

Hocus Pocus?

For all the talk about how “PR doesn’t get Social Media,” it’s safe to say that as an industry, we are learning fast.  I dare say faster than many other marketing disciplines, for whom “communities” are more often perceived as “commodities.”  

At least I like to think so. 

And then I see this come through my email:

Prgenie

(Slapping my head): I guess we’ve just been making this too hard!?  We’ve been so focused on participating with people online, with transparency and relevance, that we forgot that “spam is all you need.”  D’oh!

Owning It

Remember when Edelman screwed up and I called ‘em on it?  Remember when Racepoint screwed up and I called ‘em on it?  During that more recent episode, I predicted that we’d screw up at some point, too, and, “when (not if) that happens, all I can promise is that I’ll acknowledge it here, ASAP, and share the lessons learned.”

Welcome to my “we screwed up” post!  It’s even got a screencap!

SHIFT was one of 5 other firms outed for some blogger relations gaffes, in Marshall Kirkpatrick’s blog.  Here was our entry:

Margaret1

(I’ve redacted Margaret’s name cuz I see no reason to mess with what is assuredly a bright career in PR.  It’s a rare and terrible thing to be called out publicly like this, especially when you’re a twenty-something who simply messed up while trying to do the right thing.  Just one more peril we face as we engage in blogger relations.)

Margaret’s Mistake:  Her pitch is too vague.  There’s no value-add to Marshall, no relevant personalization, no news.  Forget about Facebook, forget about blogger relations: this is PR 101.  I’m owning and will fix it. 

That doesn’t mean we won’t screw up again.  Despite all the official and unofficial training, we will screw up again – it’s the nature of the beast.  We’ve got 100 folks now, and many more queued up in the hiring process… as we get bigger, it will be harder & harder to ensure 100% awesomeness.  (But 100% awesomeness is the goal.)     

Prom-queenBy the way, and for what it’s worth (not much), I think Marshall’s being mean with that FB response.  For a kid just getting started, the dripping sarcasm in his reply might have been lost.  He was ostensibly being “nice” to Margaret in his FB post; he’s egged her on, despite intending to call her out on her lackluster pitch. 

Isn’t that how the mean popular kids in every-teen-movie-ever-made tend to act?  I’m cool with learning lessons from constructive criticism — and I know Margaret will paste a smile on her face and soldier on — but let’s keep it all constructive, eh?  (And yes, sure, I am being defensive on behalf of a valued staffer.)

Have at it in the Comments.  I’m braced for it.

October 23, 2007

Secrets of the Socnets

IStock_000004095590XSmallInfluence stems from Participation.

If you participate meaningfully — with humor, intelligence, transparency & grace — you gain credibility.

If you gain credibility, you can begin to influence.

If you abuse your influence, you will be rejected. 

(And Google will remember it forever.)

You can be open to new players. 

You can roll around in the mud — engaged, committed, crazed & having fun — without getting dirty.

October 22, 2007

Bleeding Edginess

IStock_000004463865XSmallVia an otherwise curmudgeonly post about Social Media Releases at Chris Edwards’s “Hacking Cough” blog, I learned that Palm had implemented a Social Media Newsroom and was issuing Social Media Releases.  Add another big company to the list of adopters!

But I want to use this post to address some of Chris’s beefs with the SMR.

Chris points out that:

“…(Both) GM and Palm have implemented … pretty much all the (SMR) recommendations … With all that social support, we should be seeing conversation erupt from the page. Surely, these sites are hotbeds of company-customer interaction that demonstrate the pent-up demand for people to talk back to press releases. But it's oh so quiet. The odd bit of poker or slots comment spam has drifted in on the wind, plus a comment or two on the company's adoption of this social stuff. Not all that much about the thing that was launched ... Similarly, backlinks to other near-social releases reveal a lot of PR chatter about release formats but very little about the content of the releases themselves.”

To which the short reply is, “Welcome to the bleeding edge.  It gets quiet out here sometimes.”

And now, cuz I think Chris’s musings are relevant & probably of interest to other marketers, here’s the longer response…

The traditional press release celebrated its centennial anniversary last year.  It’s an embedded part of the way corporations, the media and the people view official news announcements. 

The SMR is about 18 months old.  In that time, many noteworthy companies have adopted the SMR, but, it’s far too early to assess whether the SMR approach is better, more effective or even more engaging!  Ask me again in 5 years.  Taking the temperature at the 5–year mark vs. the 100–year record of Ye Olde Style Release seems more than fair. 

IStock_000002946514XSmallMeanwhile, the fact that we’re seeing a lot of online PR chatter about each new SMR is a good sign that the topic is of high interest to the very people who will motivate further changes in the future … The debates and analysis underway today will ensure that the SMR becomes a standard tomorrow.  (And if not, I’m convinced that these debates will have at least improved the current hidebound approach!)

But even if the SMR does become a standard, the amount of “conversation” that will occur around each release will be directly tied to its news value (lame news = lame response, as always).

The other thing to keep in mind is that consumers are not accustomed to talking about news with the newsmakers, yet.  There’s never before been a forum for it, until recent days.  Plus, few consumers go seeking out news releases (though broader RSS usage could have an impact).  Regular people stumble upon news releases via Google searches and/or by following a link from a news article or blog post.  The consumer who does elect to comment may choose to do so at the blog post or news article that led them to the release in the first place.  (That’s why the element of trackbacks is so important to the Social Media Newsroom & SMR: to aggregate these conversations in one “official” spot.)

Will consumers EVER comment on SMRs?  Certainly we can rest assured that consumers are vocal; when given a voice, they tend to use it (usually when they are pissed off).  For evidence we need only look at the popularity of online forums.  For example, the 159,000 people who frequent Valve Entertainment’s online forum are interacting with each other, and with the company’s representatives, in the “official” place that’s been set aside for them to do so. 

If Valve were to create a Social Media Newsroom, some percentage of those 159,000 customers would likely find their way there to discuss the gaming company’s latest announcements.  There, they’d be joined by journalists & bloggers — who may have no interest in the daily flame wars lighting up the online forums, but instead merely want to get data with which to cover Valve’s news announcements.  

In the end, it doesn’t matter where the conversation happens.  By providing easy access to accurate, contextual information about the day’s news, the SMR could be just one more way (among many) for companies to interact directly with their customers. 

No Need for Words

Papelbon

Go Red Sox!

October 17, 2007

UPDATED: The Future of the Social Media Release is in Your Hands

IStock_000004107615XSmallThis post was developed jointly by Todd Defren and Brian Solis.  It was updated following some great comments and commentary across the blogosphere (and especially at Silicon Valley Watcher).

The Social Media Release (SMR) is gaining traction and visibility and is now looked to by many as the savior of the traditional press release - which may honestly be too great a task for any one tool. But, at the very least, the discussions around the SMR are fueling the evolution and improvement of the press release overall.

Each day new examples are emerging and will only continue to be showcased as Social Media purveyors blaze the trail for the future of the news release, whether it’s traditional, multimedia, social or a combination of all the above.

As Social Media evolves, so does the process of discovery, sharing, and influence.

Traditional press releases distributed over wire services, for better or worse, ARE already showing up in search engines as a natural part of the wire distribution process.

According to Outsell, Inc. over 51% of IT professionals are reporting that they get their news from press releases in Yahoo and Google news over trade journals.

It's a fact that is changing the game for PR, and it's not only being driven by journalists, but customers too.

What it really represents is an opportunity, dictated by necessity, to do things better. And, in order to do that, we need to understand the dynamics of traditional, multimedia, and social media.


Die-Press-ReleaseAs a quick refresher, the Social Media Release template from SHIFT Communications was created in response to Tom Foremski’s public call for the death of press releases. The template provided, for the first time, a one-stop resource for bloggers, journalists, and people, to find relevant information for constructing stories without the B.S., or as Foremski called it, the “spintastic” messaging prevalent in traditional press releases.

The evolution of the Social Media Release in the 18 months since the SHIFT template’s debut is simply unbelievable and testament to the cumulative desire to carry the PR profession forward, in entirely new and exciting directions.

After working together along with Chris Heuer, Shel Holtz, Shannon Whitley, among many others, it’s clear that there is a hunger to evolve the 100-year old press release format, and in the process, maybe also improve the game for PR overall. Now it’s up to all of us to define. And since the world is watching, it’s important for us to occasionally take a step back in order to to carry SMRs forward.

In the last year, we have worked diligently to defend, explain, and showcase SMRs, but there are still many questions as word of a new format spreads. (For example: “What’s the difference between a SMR and a Multimedia Release? Should we put out a SMR in tandem with a traditional release? Can I rely on these releases to do my job for me?”)

So far the examples that we’ve highlighted over the past year – whether they’ve been distributed on a wire or hosted on a Web page – have all been a step in the right direction, but at the end of the day, with few exceptions, they are not quite fully “socialized” yet. They are representative of a hybrid multimedia and social media release, which can be distributed as traditional releases as well as simply hosted on traditional web pages. (Here's an example of a release that looks social, but isn’t quite there yet.)

Social Media Releases may look similar to today’s multimedia releases in format, structure and design, but depending on a series of factors, they have the ability to open up dialog in a way not possible with traditional or multimedia releases.

An important distinction between the two, discovered after spending the last year experimenting with formats and distribution channels, is this: the content and structure of the SMR is only part of the equation.

WomanTyping325It all starts with thinking about what you want to say and figure out why it's important to those you want to reach.

A crappy press release is still a crappy press release regardless of multimedia or social bling.

Writing the news in a way that's helpful, informative, and relative is a critical starting point for any release.

SMRs are much more than bulleted text and links to multimedia content in social networks. It’s much more than simply sharing information. And, it’s definitely much more than providing building blocks in a “B.S.” free format. SMRs are a starting point for the socialization of news. We’ve got the multimedia part down: now we need to focus on the social aspects.

A big part of this socialization starts with “findability,” i.e. is the SMR discoverable outside in the world of Social Media?

Did you know that the major wire services used to be subscription-only?

Their 3,000+ daily releases were not open to the general public until recently. But the wires’ newfound openness means that traditional news releases can be discovered via Google and Yahoo. And search engines are an incredible catalyst for news distribution: people are finding news through Google and Yahoo and as a result have become more accepting of press releases as legitimate information resources, on a par with trusted trade journals (this has been documented by several analysts tracking the media space). After finding information through traditional search engines, people can still “socialize the content” by taking the initiative to manually bring it into the conversation, embedding links and content into their own blogs, del.icio.us accounts, etc.


This means that press releases, regardless of format, are now equally important to bloggers, journalists, analysts, and now, customers too!

Contrary to popular belief, however, search engines are not all created equal – especially in the world of Social Media.

23197086For example, you probably didn’t know this: traditional & multimedia releases – which would include most of the SMRs released to-date – are not readily discoverable by “social” search engines like Technorati, not even if you use Technorati tags. The T’rati tags included in most SMRs will lead the reader to contextual links (if they exist), but, the release itself will remain invisible to the social search engine. Please keep in mind that this is different that the “suggested” tags that you’re seeing in the hybrid examples out there today. If anything, they just help increase findability in traditional search.

To be “seen” by these blog-specific engines requires a separate social media optimization (SMO) aka blog search engine optimization (BSEO) process and an entirely different distribution mechanism: if the SMR is not published via a social platform (note: blogs are inherently social) like Wordpress or Blogger, it’s going to be ignored by Technorati, BlogPulse, Google Blog Search, et al. So the SMRs we’ve seen so far have rarely been part of the broader, contextual conversation.

Shannon Whitley, current chair of the Social Media Release Working Group, which is dedicated to creating technology standards for creating and distributing SMRs, offered this insight:

“The best place to publish a Social Media News Release is on your company blog or social media newsroom (which is hosted on a blogging engine). However, it's important to recognize that Search Engine Optimization (SEO) alone will not necessarily draw attention to your news. It's still important to actively promote and distribute your releases via newswires and social media tools, and – wherever you promote your news – to provide a link back to your Social Media News Release.”
This is an important point because if you’re relying on one release to reach everyone, the truth is that Social Media and multimedia releases can look exactly alike, but, they will show up in two different places.

So how do we get more “social” with our Social Media Releases?

Social can be defined as:

Hosting conversations – via moderated comments – directly at the hub of the SMR (ideally in the corporate social media newsroom) or providing a link to comments.

Providing a trackback function – and displaying the results. This is not only a good metric for marketers evaluating industry response, but also helpful to those looking for additional perspectives on the news.

Enabling links to social bookmarking sites (like del.icio.us) is good. So is the creation of purpose-built links that highlight other voices and provide context for the news.

Using links and tags that drive all of the images, video, and audio posted to social networks back to the SMR. These links and tags act as beacons for the conversation. It shouldn’t matter whether users come across a traditional, multimedia or social media release; it shouldn’t even matter if they find a “chunk” of the release’s content somewhere else on the web… by including relevant tags and by consistently associating the SMR’s dispersed content elements (on YouTube, Flickr, etc.) with the SMR’s permalink in the Social Media Newsroom, you can leave breadcrumbs that ultimately aggregate the resulting conversations in one convenient spot.
At the end of the day, the SMR was never intended to replace the traditional press release nor is it supposed to relieve you of good ol’ media and blogger relations. In fact, experience thus far shows that SMRs are much stronger when paired with both a traditional counterpart and strategic outreach.

An SMR written in either bulleted or narrative format, partnered with a “static” release – each containing reciprocal links – can not only distribute meaningful news, but also offer building blocks (shareable content); facilitate and encourage conversations and sharing (via social media tags); and ensure a presence in both blog and traditional Web search engines (via SEO and SMO).

Multiple releases can specifically appeal to different groups using the channels the reach them (customers, bloggers, journalists, etc.). It will, for the first time, combine mainstream PR while creating new arms and legs to reach important groups that comprise The Long Tail.

The key to the SMR’s long-term success will be the ability to truly be social; to not only deliver the news in a snazzy new format, but also to facilitate discovery through Social Media channels, encourage sharing and spark conversations, all in a way that brings customers, journalists, bloggers, and analysts together around your story and your community.

23288717The reason for this post is to remind people that tricking out press releases for the sake of tapping into a trend doesn't do anyone any good.

Writing the news in a way that's helpful, informative, and relative is a critical starting point for any release to be successful now and in the future.

Garbage in, garbage out.

The SMR template is a starting point to incite creativity and innovation. How you develop and issue SMRs is ultimately up to you, and given that these are the early days, the interest level is high in making sure we get this right. We’re all in this together.

This is a call to action for PR people to stop and think about the entire process and take the challenge for improvement, whether multimedia or social.

We have a responsibility to journalists, bloggers, analysts and to our customers that we need to finally take seriously. And, in order to build/continue relationships, we have to provide information in way that works for the different groups of people that want info, without the usual b.s. or spintastic hype.

October 15, 2007

Social Media News Releases Gain Momentum

IStock_000003910554XSmallNext time a skeptical PR traditionalist asks ya, “What’s all the hullabaloo about these Social Media News Releases?  Has anyone ever done one?” please direct ‘em to this post. 

Below I’ve recapped the handful that I’ve happened to save; I know there are more out there.  UPDATE: I’ve added several since posting this blog entry this morning, including one from Gatorade!)

(Send me yours and I’ll add a link!) 

I get enthused about the momentum indicated by the Big Names above.  I also offer kudos to each of these early adopters for merely trying out the approach. 

But I also readily admit that some of these SMNRs are better than others. 

Where most of these SMNR efforts fall down is in regard to “SOCIABILITY.”  There are typically many ways to save/share the links to these releases (e.g., “save to del.icio.us”), but, due to the limits of a) most wire services and b) most online corporate newsrooms, there’s a dearth of examples where the NEWS is treated as a BLOG POST, i.e., with moderated Comments & Trackbacks. 

This is a key aspect: the SMNR is not just about adding multimedia & links, it’s not just about enabling readers to save & share the content – the SMNR is also about conversation.  It’s about two-way participation between the newsmaker and their audiences.  

My prediction for 2008 with regard to the SMNR is that our successes with regard to saveable, shareable, embeddable content will also extend to sociability.  We’ll get there.  Ya heard it here first.

October 12, 2007

Links @ The Current State & Future of Public Relations

IStock_000003013231XSmallI’m not a big fan of the “Links for the Week”-type posts.  I like it when other bloggers do it, mind you – these links often uncover some great stuff that would have remained undiscovered.  I don’t do it for this blog, though, cuz I know I wouldn’t be consistent about it.   

And that’s all just a lame set-up for a “Links You Should Read” post.  In their way, each post touches on the current state of PR.

Here’s one from Brian Oberkirch of Like It Matters.  In this post, Brian plays the contrarian regarding one of the central tenets of the Cluetrain Manifesto, that, “There is no market for messages.”

When Social Media types hear that phrase, they tend to nod sagaciously.  Certainly it is true that no one’s headed to the mall with “Buy some messages” on their shopping list.  Certainly it is true that “deeds” are more powerful than “words” … “Messaging” means nothing if the company behind the brand can’t back up its claims or effectively participate with its customers.

But as Brian points out, human beings are actually voracious consumers of messages.

“…enjoy the irony that the global reproduction of phrases like ‘markets are conversations,’ ‘there is no demand for messages’ etc. proves the healthy demand for messages.  When it comes to relevant, elevating messages, we can’t get enough.  See also telenovelas, myth, jokes, ritual & so on…” 

As a PR guy – a weaver of words – I can’t help but agree.  Empty words are meaningless but messages with the heft of truth are both powerful & eagerly consumed. 

One of the primary roles of the PR pro, nowadays, is not “creator of bullshit” but rather “watchguard against bullshit.”  Because we need to “sell” our clients’ messages on the frontlines, we are acutely aware that B.S. is no longer marketable.  It’s up to us to make our clients aware of this new reality.

…Moving on to the next Link You Should Read:

One of my favorite people in the blogopshere is Constantin Basturea.  Constantin is a selfless benefactor of the PR blogosphere.  Case in point: he is set to organize his third Global PR Blog Week.  And you can help.

…Three more Links before you go:

The first two posts are by competitors (which peeves me a li’l, dang it).  Both are on the subject of the so-called “Death of PR.”

This post by Kyle Flaherty issues the challenge:  “(Viability will not come from PR firms’) ability to pitch media (traditional, blogger, vlogger or otherwise), anyone can do that internally and on the cheap. (Viability will come from the) ability to actually help create the tent to hold the community, the content to sustain the community and the brains to maintain the conversation.”

This post by Richard Edelman is certainly related to Kyle’s post, and worth reading if only for this single line: “PR should stand for Public Relationships, a transparent effort to advocate our client’s position, supported by depth of content, while offering an open place for dialogue and comment.”  That sums up the whole thing.

Last but not least, a great post by one of SHIFT’s own, Chris Apollo Lynn.  In this post at his SocialTNT blog, Chris interviews Forrester’s Charlene Li.  Great stuff.  And Chris also touches on the points rasied by Richard and Kyle: “As PR – read ‘Public Relations’ not ‘Press Relations’ – it’s often important to remind our clients that slowly seeding discussion is often about raising awareness of the product, service or company.”

See?  This is another reason I can’t handle the “Links for the Week” idea.  I can’t help but turn it into a full-fledged blog post! 

October 10, 2007

PR-Squared's Social Media Tactics Series: From Social Media Release to Twitter to Blogs to Boston Globe...

Kawasaki neighborsLast week I pointed ya’ll to this Social Media News Release (SMNR) that we put out for our client, HubSpot.  Here’s a quick case study on the strategy & “what happened next.”

We were launching a cool aspect of HubSpot’s online marketing services suite - a free SEO analysis tool, called Website Grader.  As part of the launch we worked with the client to judge the SEO capabilities of Technorati’s top 20 blogs.

This report gave us a great reason to create a SMNR and to reach out personally to the appropriate bloggers on the list, as well as to the many other elite writers who hover in that same zone. 

SIDEBAR:  Please, please, please always remember… a Social Media Release is NOT intended as a replacement for good ol’ fashioned PR.  PR has always been about “community relations.”  Just because that “community” has expanded from the “mainstream media” to the “wider world,” and just because we have fancier tools with which to work our magic, doesn’t take away the need to weave a personal, customized outreach campaign.

As part our HubSpot campaign we wrote a note to the legendary marketing guru, Guy Kawasaki.  Short & sweet:

“Hey Guy,

 

I thought you’d be interested in taking a look at a report put out today from my client, HubSpot, analyzing the SEO effectiveness of some of the top-rated blogs.  They compiled the report based on findings from their free SEO tool, Website Grader.  Here’s the release on Website Grader that went out this morning to give you a sense for how the report was generated.

 

Feel free to play around with the tool to see how your site measures up!  And of course, let me know if you have any questions I can help answer...”

GuyKawasaki5This simple offer led to two “tweets” (here & here) about the Website Grader service, and a follow-on blog post (including a Website Grader logo made available via the SMNR). 

Interestingly, Kawasaki’s first tweet references a post at Hubspot’s blog about the Top Bloggers SEO Report; a link that was referenced in the SMNR (but which was not included in our original email).  In other words: Kawasaki read the release, clicked on its links, and subsequently re-purposed the SMNR’s content for his own use. 

These blog and tweet posts by “The Big Guy” (as he’s come to be known by our in-house HubSpot team!) led to scores of additional blog posts (about 40 links in all, to-date).  And, a massive traffic spike at Website Grader.  Since the release went out, Website Grader has experienced a 2X increase in website traffic, which continues even a week later.

And then on this past Monday morning, as a direct result of Kawasaki’s post, the Boston Globe wrote a quickie piece on the HubSpot service (both online and in the print edition; the online article linked to both the Website Grader site and to the referring Kawasaki post, with the company’s logo intact).  

Of course, not everyone loved the free tool.  Both SHIFT and our client contacts at HubSpot were on the look-out for any blowback, so that the appropriate HubSpotters could respond quickly & diplomatically, both in the comments and even via a standalone post (which to-date has received almost 50 “diggs”).

Many bloggers are calling for case studies of the SMNR in action.  Here’s one for the record books.  It’s a simple strategy that would work for anyone: 

Let’s conclude with a direct quote from our client contact, Dharmesh Shah of HubSpot:

“My general sense is that the Social Media Release is easier to consume for bloggers and hence more likely to get picked up.  The format is designed for quick scanning and perhaps suppresses the natural ‘block it out’ instincts that many people have when it comes to the classic press release format… Overall, an unqualified success.”

October 09, 2007

Advertising That (Finally) Speaks to Me

Gawd, how many times can we see the same old car commercial? 

The sleek sportscar streaks through some hairpin turns alongside a spectacular coastline.  The SUV powers through some mud.  The 4x4 powers through some mud, too – but while hauling something ridiculously heavy.  ZZZZZZZZ…

You want to capture the attention of a 20 to 30–something guy?  Do it this way:

Kudos to the Toyota ad team.  (And hat-tip to the Other Todd.) 

October 05, 2007

Dealing With It

IStock_000000159241XSmallI hesitate to write this post because I don’t enjoy “piling on” when my competitors are having a bad day.  And yet, I was among the most vocal when Edelman made some bad stumbles last year, so I’d be less than honest if I didn’t mention this episode.

For background on the gaffe in question, I point you to this Valleywag post.  In short, an employee at Racepoint Group impersonated “Fake Steve Jobs” (a.k.a. FORBES editor Dan Lyons) in defense of the agency’s client, One Laptop Per Child.  You can read the string – including a public apology by one of the agency’s senior execs – here

Apologizing in the comments section of the post was a good idea, of course.  But after being outed in the Valleywag post (which sparked a few other posts by other bloggers), should Racepoint have done anything else?

I can totally empathize with the fervent desire to see this gaffe disappear slowly into the murk of cyberspace.  In fact, I was not going to write anything about this issue… until I did a Google search on Racepoint, and saw that the Valleywag post was in the Top 10 results.

Rp-goog

As an agency owner myself, that would scare the bejeezus out of me.  Given the top-10 prominence of this search result, if it were me I think I’d publish a special post at the Racepoint blog along the lines of, “what went wrong, how we addressed it, and gosh, we are sorry … one of many lessons learned in this new era.” 

Short, sweet, painful – but at least an official public acknowledgement.  That way, anyone googling the agency’s name may still see the gaffe on-display at Valleywag, but, they’d also be likely to catch the apology at the Racepoint blog.

That’s just PR 101 in the Age of Google, in which our mistakes live online forever

The truth is that mistakes are gonna happen (follow those links for a reminder of some of our own past challenges).  I have no doubt at all that – despite our near-daily in-house conversations about Blogger Relations – someday, someone at SHIFT will make a mistake of this nature.  Then it’ll be my butt with the bull’s-eye on it. 

When (not if) that happens, all I can promise is that I’ll acknowledge it here, ASAP, and share the lessons learned.

October 03, 2007

Two More Social Media News Releases

369861_GraphingSocialPatternsIt’s Social Media News Release Week!  (Hadn’t you heard?)

Two more SMNRs hit the wires today.  One was from our client, HubSpot.  I am going to blog a bit more about HubSpot in the next day or so because “what they’re up to” is cool and relevant to many readers of this blog.  In the meantime, though, I want to point ya’ll to the release and specifically suggest that you take 2 minutes to “grade” your website or blog at www.websitegrader.com

What score did you get?  Let me know! 

UPDATE: Guy Kawasaki digs it.  (Cool!)

Meanwhile, though, check out this other SMNR (courtesy of Brian Solis)about the Graphing Social Patterns conference (Oct. 7 – 9 in San Jose). 

This is “the first conference covering both the business and technology issues of Facebook and other social networking platforms.”  But from the look of it, this crowd is all business.  I am sure that there will be plenty of geekspeak (via an “all-day-all-night ‘App-a-thon’ coding contest”), but, the guest list is a Who’s Who of “People You Ought To Know.”

Reid Hoffman of LinkedIn (and godfather of Web 2.0 VC).  Tim O'Reilly, co-founder of the Web 2.0 Expo conferences. Dave Morin, Senior Platform Manager at Facebook. Mike Arrington of TechCrunch (now re-named “The $100M TechCrunch”).  Danny Sullivan, founder of Search Engine Land.  Charlene Li, the socnet guru from Forrester Research.

The SMNR announcing this conference has more details, including an embedded video featuring conference chief Dave McClure of 500 Hats.

 

It’s a real testament to the rise of Facebook that in less than 6 months (they opened up the Facebook Platform to developers in late May), a high-quality conference like this one has been spawned.

October 02, 2007

A Social Media Release @ Work

A quick double-whammy for you guys today…

 

First, a great example of a Social Media News Release (SMNR) from one of our clients, Eurekster

Eurekster is a social search pioneer: their “search wikis” (a.k.a. swicki) are based on topics of interest to a website publisher and their audience; the search results improve as the publisher’s community gets involved.  (Ex: a travel blogger’s swicki may create a tagcloud of “top destinations,” and the search engine gets smarter as the blog’s readers click on the search terms.)

Today’s announcement proclaims “the availability of custom social video search and a video buzzcloud widget featuring … content from blinkx.”  So if you extend the “travel blog” example I just used, you get a video swicki like this one (it’s cool; you should click on it). 

I know there are a lot of videophiles out there for whom this video swicki would be a cool addition to their blogs.  If you make one, let me know?

What I like about this SMNR

  • Crisp, interesting pictures of the announcement’s principal players. Not typical headshots.
  • The ability to email the release to a friend. (shareability!)
  • A Wikipedia link about “social search.” (context!)
  • All the Social Media tags you could want. (T’rati tags, digg, del.icio.us, etc.)
  • Embedded video within the release, which is itself embeddable by bloggers (as seen above).  How nice to see an online release treated as a fully-functional online resource.
  • Also, this release is about a “partnership” – any PR pro will tell you that “partnership releases” are generally a yawn.  But with this video – which features the CEOs of the two companies having a nice chat about today’s news – we can visibly demonstrate the camaraderie and goodwill (not to mention hear about the relevance of the news, direct from the sources).

Forget for a moment that you could easily accuse me of flogging a client’s news.  (For the record, they didn’t ask me to write anything; this post will be a surprise to them.)  If you can get past that, think about this:

For this post, I used the links and embedded video and some quotable language from the original SMNR.  I’ve re-purposed the content of the SMNR to suit my own ends, and in the process added to the buzz about this announcement.

In part, it is the ability to easily re-purpose and broadly share this news content that makes the SMNR such a powerful concept.

October 01, 2007

A Confederacy of Todds

Todd2I was thrilled when Todd Andrlik of the popular ToddAnd Blog agreed to take my place at Ragan’s Social Media Summit in Chicago last week.  As part of his prep, he asked me to share the Powerpoint presentation I’d been using to describe the Social Media News Release.

“Sure thing, no problemo,” I said.  “Use it as you see fit.”

Imagine my delight when I saw that he had transformed that simplistic presentation into a work of art.  There are many elements intact from my original presentation, but Todd absolutely improved on it – both graphically and conceptually – and made it his own.  (Feel free to stop reading the rest of this blog post and go git Todd’s presentation right now.) 

I heard through the grapevine from the Ragan attendees that Todd did a great job of evangelizing the SMNR concept.  Must be something about the name…

In a follow-up conversation, Todd & I speculated that one reason that the SMNR has struck a chord is that it feels very tactical: in a sea of nebulous “conversations about conversations,” the SMNR is something “physical” that marketing pros can point to as a substantive, deliverable, practical change.

Feel free to leave comments about the presentation here at PR-Squared, or more appropriately at Todd Andrlik’s own post.

Clicky Web Analytics