« Expectation-Setting Challenges in PR | Main | Giving Thanks & Knocking Wood »

More on the Menace of Marketing Measurement

IStock_000001689949XSmallMarketing measurement guru Katie Paine pointed to a recent blog post of mine re: Social Media Measurement ROI in her most recent newsletter article

I am always honored when I merit Katie’s attention — but, darn it! — I think she called me (and my ilk) a “menace” because I seemed to hem-and-haw about the ability to measure Social Media Marketing. 

Seriously, though, I have been an advocate for measurement for a long time — and even went to considerable expense to try to figure it out for clients.  So this paragraph in Katie’s newsletter caught my attention:

KD_Paine“Another popular reason that PR/SM ‘can't be measured’ is that, ‘You can't isolate PR from everything else the organization is doing!’ But yes, in fact, you can. It might take some coordination with advertising, or some sophisticated ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) but it can be done, and is being done every day. (Measurement is) hard … particularly for the math-phobic PR folks. It requires calculations and analytics and a bunch of things that PR people hate.”

As I noted to Katie in a follow-up email, the big challenge is not just the math-phobia of marketers.  The bigger challenges relate to the time; the expense; the lack of agreed-to approaches and relevant metrics (as in “what’s relevant?”); and, the potential need to collaborate at both a strategy and a systems-level with external agencies, as well as with other internal departments like Sales and Finance. 

Phew!  Say that 5x fast.

Measurement is GOOD but arguably too hard to countenance, especially when the anecdotal benefits of PR and Social Media (e.g., “website traffic spiked after that NYT hit!”) are often “good enough” to keep the engine running. 

I strongly believe that corporations who do spend the time/resources to “figure it out” would find that PR/SM’s benefits outstripped any other marketing program – which is why I am a big fan of Marketing Measurement.  Yet, it is hard to find companies willing and able to do the hard work (especially among startups, but even amongst our FORTUNE 500 clients).

Hope that clarifies my stance for Katie.  I am NOT anti-measurement, NOT a non-believing menace; just a rueful pragmatist (who is also, yes, admittedly, bad at math).

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.pr-squared.com/MT_Virtual/mt-tb.cgi/1103

Comments

Todd,

I weighed in on this. Not on the value, but on the difficulty in accomplishing the sell-in. http://tinyurl.com/5j9ohh.

I would love to hear your thoughts.

Mark

Mark, I'm getting a 404 on the URL in your comment.

Thanks for the article....

Post a comment

PR Squared Comment Policies: PR Squared is owned & written by Todd Defren. The content of the blog represents his opinions but does not necessarily reflect the opinions of SHIFT Communications or its employees.

By commenting at PR Squared, you are granting its owner license to the content of your comment, and acknowledge that the authors do not have a duty to modify or withdraw posts, but that we may do so if we choose, for any reason.

PR Squared strives to maintain an atmosphere of free & open conversation. “Constructive criticism” is okay. Personal attacks are not okay. This is a private website, and we reserve the right to delete any comments we find offensive.

If a commenter repeatedly abuses PR Squared’s comment policy, then none of their comments will be published in the future (even if those subsequent comments are “good”).

Anonymous comments or comments made under an assumed name will not be posted. Comments that smack of “spam” will not be posted.


Clicky Web Analytics