<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Duty of the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/05/the_duty_of_the_internet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/05/the_duty_of_the_internet</link>
	<description>Social Media and Public Relations Consulting � PR Squared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:48:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: "Amanda Chapel"</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/05/the_duty_of_the_internet/comment-page-1#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>"Amanda Chapel"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=348#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>First off, as to &quot;futility of censorship&quot;... IT’S SOMEONE ELSE’S FUCKING PROPERTY!  The futility is in the now apparent failure to lock one’s door to the horde of marauding geek looters.  And then you post it too Todd. WTF! I hope every general counsel of every client you represent reads that. I’d have you fired first thing Monday morning.

As to &quot;revolutionary&quot;... that’s a total mockery of the word. The American Revolution was a fight for representative government and to own private property. It was NOT about mob rule, trespass, theft and anarchy.

THEN, to some how relate that to the Army controlling the battle environment.  Again, WTF!  To say that the Army could extend restriction on communications even to private email, is to not understand the military.
There is no private anything when you&#039;re in the Army.  YOU&#039;RE A SOLDIER!

And to end with ML&#039;s &quot;Let Freedom Ring!&quot;... WTF Todd!!!

Truly, this is your worse post ever. You first sided with a concept completely antithetical to what you do for a living; you then take a dog leg left and demonstrate a completely naïve understanding of what war is all about; and then you rob from a cultural icon to put a bow on it.

This is the very stuff that makes PR embarrassing.

- Amanda
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, as to &#8220;futility of censorship&#8221;&#8230; IT’S SOMEONE ELSE’S FUCKING PROPERTY!  The futility is in the now apparent failure to lock one’s door to the horde of marauding geek looters.  And then you post it too Todd. WTF! I hope every general counsel of every client you represent reads that. I’d have you fired first thing Monday morning.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;revolutionary&#8221;&#8230; that’s a total mockery of the word. The American Revolution was a fight for representative government and to own private property. It was NOT about mob rule, trespass, theft and anarchy.</p>
<p>THEN, to some how relate that to the Army controlling the battle environment.  Again, WTF!  To say that the Army could extend restriction on communications even to private email, is to not understand the military.<br />
There is no private anything when you&#8217;re in the Army.  YOU&#8217;RE A SOLDIER!</p>
<p>And to end with ML&#8217;s &#8220;Let Freedom Ring!&#8221;&#8230; WTF Todd!!!</p>
<p>Truly, this is your worse post ever. You first sided with a concept completely antithetical to what you do for a living; you then take a dog leg left and demonstrate a completely naïve understanding of what war is all about; and then you rob from a cultural icon to put a bow on it.</p>
<p>This is the very stuff that makes PR embarrassing.</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Biro</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/05/the_duty_of_the_internet/comment-page-1#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Biro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=348#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Now I obviously don&#039;t know the ramifications of these devices in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan, but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if we started to see the proliferation of mobile devices being used, after being registered by third parties, in order to blog in that fashion. Just a thought.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I obviously don&#8217;t know the ramifications of these devices in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan, but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if we started to see the proliferation of mobile devices being used, after being registered by third parties, in order to blog in that fashion. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tangeman @ media mindshare</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/05/the_duty_of_the_internet/comment-page-1#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tangeman @ media mindshare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=348#comment-658</guid>
		<description>Great post, Todd. Can only agree ... the freer the flow, the more freedom we know!

Posted a link today to Shel Israel&#039;s post urging support for re-introduced Federal Shield Law, a much-needed protection of free flow of information in the the traditional journalism realm.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Todd. Can only agree &#8230; the freer the flow, the more freedom we know!</p>
<p>Posted a link today to Shel Israel&#8217;s post urging support for re-introduced Federal Shield Law, a much-needed protection of free flow of information in the the traditional journalism realm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
