<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Niches Happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/niches_happen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/niches_happen</link>
	<description>Social Media and Public Relations Consulting � PR Squared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Small Business Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/niches_happen/comment-page-1#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Business Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=448#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we had rather call them cliques as opposed to niches.  The difference being that a niche is fairly well defined by demographic, psychographic or even geographic factors. A clique is a little more casual.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we had rather call them cliques as opposed to niches.  The difference being that a niche is fairly well defined by demographic, psychographic or even geographic factors. A clique is a little more casual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Reidt</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/niches_happen/comment-page-1#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Reidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=448#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>I agree that letting the users of social media determine the form or group is the best way to go. People will create their own meaning out of it regardless, why try and force them into specific boxes?

Like the comment from Jeremiah above, we all belong to numerous networks, both in real life and on the web. If we have to go to a dozen different network sites to interact, the majority of the community won&#039;t be very active. Better to have one large group with niches within it, where it&#039;s easy to stay active in multiple areas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that letting the users of social media determine the form or group is the best way to go. People will create their own meaning out of it regardless, why try and force them into specific boxes?</p>
<p>Like the comment from Jeremiah above, we all belong to numerous networks, both in real life and on the web. If we have to go to a dozen different network sites to interact, the majority of the community won&#8217;t be very active. Better to have one large group with niches within it, where it&#8217;s easy to stay active in multiple areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/niches_happen/comment-page-1#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=448#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>Thanks Todd for adding to this conversation.  I do see some smaller niche communities forming in Facebook.  People belong to many communities, not just one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Todd for adding to this conversation.  I do see some smaller niche communities forming in Facebook.  People belong to many communities, not just one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
