<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bastardization of Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m</link>
	<description>Social Media and Public Relations Consulting � PR Squared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Defren</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-2#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Defren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>Paul, I note and appreciate the distinction.  In this particular case, the company didn&#039;t want to be personally involved in the conversation - there would be no &quot;community managers&quot; per se... the company only wanted to ensure that others were speaking *about* them.

To which I say, &quot;blecch.&quot;

However, having been part of the traditional marketing scene for many years, I do hear ya.  I have no problem with tapping into Social Media to help &quot;sell more product,&quot; so long as it&#039;s done respectfully, thoughtfully...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I note and appreciate the distinction.  In this particular case, the company didn&#8217;t want to be personally involved in the conversation &#8211; there would be no &#8220;community managers&#8221; per se&#8230; the company only wanted to ensure that others were speaking *about* them.</p>
<p>To which I say, &#8220;blecch.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, having been part of the traditional marketing scene for many years, I do hear ya.  I have no problem with tapping into Social Media to help &#8220;sell more product,&#8221; so long as it&#8217;s done respectfully, thoughtfully&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-2#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>Todd - I enjoy your blog a lot, but there&#039;s something that bothers me about this conversation...you state &quot;They didn’t want to be part of the conversation; they wanted to be the topic of the conversation.&quot;  If you had said &quot;they wanted to be the topic of the conversation but they didn&#039;t want to be a part of the conversation,&quot; I&#039;d be completely on board...but the other way around?  I completely agree that companies that aren&#039;t ready to engage in authentic conversations with their customers shouldn&#039;t touch social media...but if they are ready to engage in these conversations, isn&#039;t it reasonable to assume that they&#039;d be centered on topics associated with the brand?

This seems to be a common idea among many of the influential PR and social media bloggers....Stowe Boyd&#039;s recent response to the Chip Griffin post where he describes the words &quot;messages&quot; and &quot;audiences&quot; as though they&#039;re completely antithetical to the ideas of conversation is an example of that.  As a product marketer, I&#039;m not sure what people think we&#039;re supposed to be talking about.  If we&#039;re not supposed to want to engage in conversations about our product, what should we be doing?...sit around the conversation hoping that someday someone will say something associated with the product?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd &#8211; I enjoy your blog a lot, but there&#8217;s something that bothers me about this conversation&#8230;you state &#8220;They didn’t want to be part of the conversation; they wanted to be the topic of the conversation.&#8221;  If you had said &#8220;they wanted to be the topic of the conversation but they didn&#8217;t want to be a part of the conversation,&#8221; I&#8217;d be completely on board&#8230;but the other way around?  I completely agree that companies that aren&#8217;t ready to engage in authentic conversations with their customers shouldn&#8217;t touch social media&#8230;but if they are ready to engage in these conversations, isn&#8217;t it reasonable to assume that they&#8217;d be centered on topics associated with the brand?</p>
<p>This seems to be a common idea among many of the influential PR and social media bloggers&#8230;.Stowe Boyd&#8217;s recent response to the Chip Griffin post where he describes the words &#8220;messages&#8221; and &#8220;audiences&#8221; as though they&#8217;re completely antithetical to the ideas of conversation is an example of that.  As a product marketer, I&#8217;m not sure what people think we&#8217;re supposed to be talking about.  If we&#8217;re not supposed to want to engage in conversations about our product, what should we be doing?&#8230;sit around the conversation hoping that someday someone will say something associated with the product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david cushman</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>david cushman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Todd, thank you very much for one simple summing up of how brands get it so horribly wrong so often.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, thank you very much for one simple summing up of how brands get it so horribly wrong so often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Defren</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Defren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>Jason, thanks for the kind words. (But honestly, we&#039;re up 25% this year. I am juuuuust fine!) :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, thanks for the kind words. (But honestly, we&#8217;re up 25% this year. I am juuuuust fine!) <img src='http://www.pr-squared.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Falls</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Falls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the client loss, but I learned the hard way early this year that the ones who are disingenuous to the process are the exact ones you don&#039;t want around. There&#039;s something noble about being able to walk away from it and find fortunes elsewhere, which I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll do. Sorry the &quot;loss&quot; comes this time of year though. Holiday downers stink. Keep your head up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the client loss, but I learned the hard way early this year that the ones who are disingenuous to the process are the exact ones you don&#8217;t want around. There&#8217;s something noble about being able to walk away from it and find fortunes elsewhere, which I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll do. Sorry the &#8220;loss&#8221; comes this time of year though. Holiday downers stink. Keep your head up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Block</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>While it would be best for companies to not only engage the community instead of just sharing, this is still a growing process.  Not everyone gets it.  Yet.  If I don&#039;t understand how medical insurance works, should I not be entitled to have it?  We just need to keep plugging away until they do understand.  Shel Israel signed a copy of his book for me and wrote in it, &quot;Good luck pushing the rock up the PR mountain.&quot;  That rock can roll down, but I won&#039;t stop pushing it.  (pretty corny, i know)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it would be best for companies to not only engage the community instead of just sharing, this is still a growing process.  Not everyone gets it.  Yet.  If I don&#8217;t understand how medical insurance works, should I not be entitled to have it?  We just need to keep plugging away until they do understand.  Shel Israel signed a copy of his book for me and wrote in it, &#8220;Good luck pushing the rock up the PR mountain.&#8221;  That rock can roll down, but I won&#8217;t stop pushing it.  (pretty corny, i know)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having the exact same conversations with potential clients here in the UK but several stages back.

They don&#039;t yet have a social media box to tick but they&#039;ve been on Facebook and are getting the bit about lots of people deserting traditional media and interacting in a different way but haven&#039;t got to grips with the &#039;different way&#039; yet.

Can I come and work in the US?!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having the exact same conversations with potential clients here in the UK but several stages back.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t yet have a social media box to tick but they&#8217;ve been on Facebook and are getting the bit about lots of people deserting traditional media and interacting in a different way but haven&#8217;t got to grips with the &#8216;different way&#8217; yet.</p>
<p>Can I come and work in the US?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Defren</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Defren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>Thanks all, for the comments.  I know many of ya feel my pain/joy.

Mike, you&#039;re right that we were absolutely delighted to even be invited to the party; it was a victory in itself.  But I am still kinda glad that we didn&#039;t win.  While the name on the client roster would have been amazing, I fear that behind the scenes, it would have resulted in a lot of bloody foreheads over here, as we kept ramming into brick walls.

Or maybe it&#039;s sour grapes, I dunno.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all, for the comments.  I know many of ya feel my pain/joy.</p>
<p>Mike, you&#8217;re right that we were absolutely delighted to even be invited to the party; it was a victory in itself.  But I am still kinda glad that we didn&#8217;t win.  While the name on the client roster would have been amazing, I fear that behind the scenes, it would have resulted in a lot of bloody foreheads over here, as we kept ramming into brick walls.</p>
<p>Or maybe it&#8217;s sour grapes, I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schawbel</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schawbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>Social media is less about being selfish and more about pleasing your audience.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media is less about being selfish and more about pleasing your audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2007/12/the_bastardization_of_social_m/comment-page-1#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=449#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Ah, did you really lose? Or did you, just maybe, help someone make progress? I&#039;m sure you can answer differently in each case but the fact that you even had the conversation with them at all is better than nothing...hopefully...right? OK, I&#039;m an optimist.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, did you really lose? Or did you, just maybe, help someone make progress? I&#8217;m sure you can answer differently in each case but the fact that you even had the conversation with them at all is better than nothing&#8230;hopefully&#8230;right? OK, I&#8217;m an optimist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
