<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bad Week for Brands in the Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b</link>
	<description>Social Media and Public Relations Consulting � PR Squared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JTPRATT's Blogging Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator>JTPRATT's Blogging Mistakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-3160</guid>
		<description>That and the fact that Ford&#039;s Social Media Press Release idea at digital snippets didn&#039;t turn out much better:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jtpratt.com/2008/01/31/ford-uses-wordpress-and-social-media/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ford uses Wordpress and Social Media&lt;/a&gt;...your thoughts on this?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That and the fact that Ford&#8217;s Social Media Press Release idea at digital snippets didn&#8217;t turn out much better:  <a href="http://www.jtpratt.com/2008/01/31/ford-uses-wordpress-and-social-media/" rel="nofollow">Ford uses Wordpress and Social Media</a>&#8230;your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTPRATT's Blogging Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>JTPRATT's Blogging Mistakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>That and the fact that Ford&#039;s Social Media Press Release idea at digital snippets didn&#039;t turn out much better:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jtpratt.com/2008/01/31/ford-uses-wordpress-and-social-media/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ford uses Wordpress and Social Media&lt;/a&gt;...your thoughts on this?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That and the fact that Ford&#8217;s Social Media Press Release idea at digital snippets didn&#8217;t turn out much better:  <a href="http://www.jtpratt.com/2008/01/31/ford-uses-wordpress-and-social-media/" rel="nofollow">Ford uses Wordpress and Social Media</a>&#8230;your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Maruggi</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Maruggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>
Todd - tip of the hat for the Jeremy Pepper Blog Truth vs Real Truth link, that&#039;s a great observation.

As is your tradition, this post is on the mark.  I was at a PR Newswire breakfast in Minneapolis about social media this week and the questions asked were mostly so basic that it just makes me understand just how much work we need to do within our own profession.

I would love to know the true timeline of how this unfolded within Target, what was the thought process.

Until I know I can only guess and remain befuddled.  Nonetheless, it&#039;s a learning moment for us all so I posted 5 lessons learned from Target missing the PR mark
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2qh8l9&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2qh8l9&lt;/a&gt;

Nice post Todd and have a great 3 day weekend.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd &#8211; tip of the hat for the Jeremy Pepper Blog Truth vs Real Truth link, that&#8217;s a great observation.</p>
<p>As is your tradition, this post is on the mark.  I was at a PR Newswire breakfast in Minneapolis about social media this week and the questions asked were mostly so basic that it just makes me understand just how much work we need to do within our own profession.</p>
<p>I would love to know the true timeline of how this unfolded within Target, what was the thought process.</p>
<p>Until I know I can only guess and remain befuddled.  Nonetheless, it&#8217;s a learning moment for us all so I posted 5 lessons learned from Target missing the PR mark<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2qh8l9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2qh8l9</a></p>
<p>Nice post Todd and have a great 3 day weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Venorsky</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Venorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Target has left me speechless... sort of. This really surprised me. They are missing a huge opportunity here - the bulk of their customer is online, and a good portion blogging. Why wouldn&#039;t you want to participate in that conversation and encourage it? If anything, it&#039;s a free focus group. Saying you don&#039;t recognize the power of this is simply foolish. And something I&#039;m sure they will take back in the very near future. As someone in PR, I spend a good portion of my time convincing my clients to embrace new media and its power. If anything, I spend more time pitching bloggers then I do traditional journalists. In many instances, they have more power. Not recognizing them - Target, you should embrace them!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Target has left me speechless&#8230; sort of. This really surprised me. They are missing a huge opportunity here &#8211; the bulk of their customer is online, and a good portion blogging. Why wouldn&#8217;t you want to participate in that conversation and encourage it? If anything, it&#8217;s a free focus group. Saying you don&#8217;t recognize the power of this is simply foolish. And something I&#8217;m sure they will take back in the very near future. As someone in PR, I spend a good portion of my time convincing my clients to embrace new media and its power. If anything, I spend more time pitching bloggers then I do traditional journalists. In many instances, they have more power. Not recognizing them &#8211; Target, you should embrace them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Bullseye</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Bullseye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jumping the Gun (and Other PR Blog Jots)&lt;/strong&gt;

The blogosphere has been quite taken with the separate social media gaffes from Target and Ford this week. Hear what Shel Holtz and Joe Jaffe had to say about the situation. Also: Edelman&#039;s white paper and measuring online influence.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jumping the Gun (and Other PR Blog Jots)</strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere has been quite taken with the separate social media gaffes from Target and Ford this week. Hear what Shel Holtz and Joe Jaffe had to say about the situation. Also: Edelman&#8217;s white paper and measuring online influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-3159</guid>
		<description>Another Quick Thought –

This isn’t the first time Cafepress has been at the center of a large brand and a trademark dispute with a passionate fan-base.   As part of a marketing campaign by Universal Studios to promote the movie “Serenity” – the movie spin-off from the well written, yet prematurely canceled Fox show Firefly – they enlisted the well organized ‘Browncoats’ - zealot fans of original show.

Universal encouraged fans of the tv-show to help promote the Serenity movie through a viral marketing campaign.    However, after being encouraged to host parties, develop bumper stickers and t-shirts – spreading the word throughout the verse, the studio started legal action against the very fans they turned to – demanding ~$9,000 in licensing fees against Cafepress as one example and issuing a number of other cease and desist orders against numerous other fans.

The backlash of large brands trying to maintain draconian control over the how their own customer base use their products and services is only going to increase.

Change – she is a coming and Companies can either help usher in a more open, transparent and supportive culture to the market - further establishing and extending and their brand or suffer a closed circuit blackout.

In Universal Studios case – this is how the Firefly fans that they once courted responded – A retroactive invoice from them for their services in promoting the movie.

If you want control – you’ll have to pay – one way or another.....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Quick Thought –</p>
<p>This isn’t the first time Cafepress has been at the center of a large brand and a trademark dispute with a passionate fan-base.   As part of a marketing campaign by Universal Studios to promote the movie “Serenity” – the movie spin-off from the well written, yet prematurely canceled Fox show Firefly – they enlisted the well organized ‘Browncoats’ &#8211; zealot fans of original show.</p>
<p>Universal encouraged fans of the tv-show to help promote the Serenity movie through a viral marketing campaign.    However, after being encouraged to host parties, develop bumper stickers and t-shirts – spreading the word throughout the verse, the studio started legal action against the very fans they turned to – demanding ~$9,000 in licensing fees against Cafepress as one example and issuing a number of other cease and desist orders against numerous other fans.</p>
<p>The backlash of large brands trying to maintain draconian control over the how their own customer base use their products and services is only going to increase.</p>
<p>Change – she is a coming and Companies can either help usher in a more open, transparent and supportive culture to the market &#8211; further establishing and extending and their brand or suffer a closed circuit blackout.</p>
<p>In Universal Studios case – this is how the Firefly fans that they once courted responded – A retroactive invoice from them for their services in promoting the movie.</p>
<p>If you want control – you’ll have to pay – one way or another&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Holtz</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Holtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Scrabulous story, they ARE talking, according to a Hasbro spokesperson.

Here&#039;s the quote, from an ABC News story: &quot;We are reviewing a number of options with the parties involved and hope to find an amicable solution. If we cannot come to one quickly, we will be forced to close down the site and its associated distribution points.&quot;

As I pointed in a post on my blog, the law leaves the lawyers little option but to establish a record of action, but that doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re not interested in talking.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Scrabulous story, they ARE talking, according to a Hasbro spokesperson.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the quote, from an ABC News story: &#8220;We are reviewing a number of options with the parties involved and hope to find an amicable solution. If we cannot come to one quickly, we will be forced to close down the site and its associated distribution points.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I pointed in a post on my blog, the law leaves the lawyers little option but to establish a record of action, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re not interested in talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie heckenberger</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/01/a_bad_week_for_brands_in_the_b/comment-page-1#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>annie heckenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=460#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the linklove. I just can&#039;t identify with a Brand who doesn&#039;t want to connect with me and I will not support them. Bye Bye, Target. You just lost a S/W/Urban professional in the 25-54 demo. You can keep your Isaac and sell it to your &quot;core guest&quot; - whomever that was.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the linklove. I just can&#8217;t identify with a Brand who doesn&#8217;t want to connect with me and I will not support them. Bye Bye, Target. You just lost a S/W/Urban professional in the 25-54 demo. You can keep your Isaac and sell it to your &#8220;core guest&#8221; &#8211; whomever that was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
