<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Will You Kick Ass For Us?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us</link>
	<description>Social Media and Public Relations Consulting � PR Squared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Defren</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Defren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>Thanks again, all, for the great comments!

@CS - re: &quot;How do you know that is really the client&#039;s question. What if the real question is &quot;are you big enough to handle this job for us?&quot; or &quot;what other large/small/retail/national chain [insert variation here] have you worked for?&quot;

This is where Emotional Intelligence needs to kick-in.  I try to figure out the question-behind-the-question, and while I am not confrontational, I do sometimes ask outright, &quot;Are you trying to figure out whether we&#039;re big enough (or experienced enough) to handle this?&quot;

But I also assume that anyone who&#039;s invited us to the table has done a basic search on our credentials, since they likely don&#039;t want to waste their own time talking to an unqualified firm!  So, if you assume that the Credentials Check has ALREADY been passed, you can move to the questions about Bandwidth (or similar concerns).


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again, all, for the great comments!</p>
<p>@CS &#8211; re: &#8220;How do you know that is really the client&#8217;s question. What if the real question is &#8220;are you big enough to handle this job for us?&#8221; or &#8220;what other large/small/retail/national chain [insert variation here] have you worked for?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is where Emotional Intelligence needs to kick-in.  I try to figure out the question-behind-the-question, and while I am not confrontational, I do sometimes ask outright, &#8220;Are you trying to figure out whether we&#8217;re big enough (or experienced enough) to handle this?&#8221;</p>
<p>But I also assume that anyone who&#8217;s invited us to the table has done a basic search on our credentials, since they likely don&#8217;t want to waste their own time talking to an unqualified firm!  So, if you assume that the Credentials Check has ALREADY been passed, you can move to the questions about Bandwidth (or similar concerns).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>CS Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>So Todd, how do you suggest that you put it to the client. Do you actually say &quot;we have the bandwidth to kick ass with you/for you&quot; or whatever local variation of that.

How do you know that is really the client&#039;s question. What is the real question is &quot;are you big enough to handle this job for us?&quot; or &quot;what other large/small/retail/national chain [insert variation here] have you worked for?&quot;

Do you just guess what you think they mean? Do you confront, call them out on it? Do you just answer the question and hope it matches with their expectations?

I&#039;m asking seriously cause I deal with this feeling often.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Todd, how do you suggest that you put it to the client. Do you actually say &#8220;we have the bandwidth to kick ass with you/for you&#8221; or whatever local variation of that.</p>
<p>How do you know that is really the client&#8217;s question. What is the real question is &#8220;are you big enough to handle this job for us?&#8221; or &#8220;what other large/small/retail/national chain [insert variation here] have you worked for?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you just guess what you think they mean? Do you confront, call them out on it? Do you just answer the question and hope it matches with their expectations?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m asking seriously cause I deal with this feeling often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>I agree with Adam.

From my experience in another industry, the bandwith-account-backfilling-hiring-poor-training issue isn&#039;t exclusive to PR firms. I think many businesses based on the client/consultant model suffer from the same malaise. Is that the right word? Dysfunction?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Adam.</p>
<p>From my experience in another industry, the bandwith-account-backfilling-hiring-poor-training issue isn&#8217;t exclusive to PR firms. I think many businesses based on the client/consultant model suffer from the same malaise. Is that the right word? Dysfunction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator>adam cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1460</guid>
		<description>Todd - Great post.  This holds true for any kind of services firm.  As a small company, the concern becomes billable hours.  When the company is growing, it&#039;s hard to justify carrying a bench of talent, so what happens?  Hire to sold work.  It&#039;s dangerous since no one&#039;s recruiting process is a) bulletproof or b) predictable.
It&#039;s important to have rigorous pipeline management as well.  If you suddenly have a bunch of client opportunities that turn from speculative to sold overnight, you can be strapped by resources and risk pulling people from current client work to get through the crunch.  I&#039;d make the same recommendations to prospective clients, with the addition of taking time to work with your service partner to make a realistic schedule that everyone can commit to.
Adam

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd &#8211; Great post.  This holds true for any kind of services firm.  As a small company, the concern becomes billable hours.  When the company is growing, it&#8217;s hard to justify carrying a bench of talent, so what happens?  Hire to sold work.  It&#8217;s dangerous since no one&#8217;s recruiting process is a) bulletproof or b) predictable.<br />
It&#8217;s important to have rigorous pipeline management as well.  If you suddenly have a bunch of client opportunities that turn from speculative to sold overnight, you can be strapped by resources and risk pulling people from current client work to get through the crunch.  I&#8217;d make the same recommendations to prospective clients, with the addition of taking time to work with your service partner to make a realistic schedule that everyone can commit to.<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Defren</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Defren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Susan - ugh, you just made me sick to my stomach with those examples.  While I expect some SHIFTers will sometimes make mistakes in their outreach, despite the training, I *hope* they are not the type of LAME errors you&#039;ve offered up!  (Sigh.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan &#8211; ugh, you just made me sick to my stomach with those examples.  While I expect some SHIFTers will sometimes make mistakes in their outreach, despite the training, I *hope* they are not the type of LAME errors you&#8217;ve offered up!  (Sigh.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Getgood</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Getgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Training is a huge issue, and agencies -- like SHIFT -- that make the effort are unfortunately going to be lumped in with the ones that don&#039;t.

You linked to one of my recent examples of sloppy outreach. Here are a few more, all of which have been received by me or people I know in the last few weeks.
- Pitches addressed to the wrong person
- Pitches that have multiple fonts, font sizes and even colors, making it clear that the pitch was created by cut and paste.
- Pitches with  the little &gt;&gt; symbols before each line. Duh! A forwarded pitch.

And the favorite: A pitch for an event featuring the Dalai Lama that spelled his name wrong --as Dali Lama. Please, get the client&#039;s name right :-)

These aren&#039;t necessarily bad content, though some did suffer from that as well. It was sloppy work that might be avoided with a little more training in the tools. Use spellcheck. Learn how to use the email editor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Training is a huge issue, and agencies &#8212; like SHIFT &#8212; that make the effort are unfortunately going to be lumped in with the ones that don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>You linked to one of my recent examples of sloppy outreach. Here are a few more, all of which have been received by me or people I know in the last few weeks.<br />
- Pitches addressed to the wrong person<br />
- Pitches that have multiple fonts, font sizes and even colors, making it clear that the pitch was created by cut and paste.<br />
- Pitches with  the little >> symbols before each line. Duh! A forwarded pitch.</p>
<p>And the favorite: A pitch for an event featuring the Dalai Lama that spelled his name wrong &#8211;as Dali Lama. Please, get the client&#8217;s name right <img src='http://www.pr-squared.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>These aren&#8217;t necessarily bad content, though some did suffer from that as well. It was sloppy work that might be avoided with a little more training in the tools. Use spellcheck. Learn how to use the email editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary H.</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>How do you mention employee bandwidth? Is that a measure of hours?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you mention employee bandwidth? Is that a measure of hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Block</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s constantly something that comes up at our firm.  Thankfully, we can plan ahead for these things with the right people for the right job.  One idea is evaluate everyones&#039; availability on certain accounts to determine what extra time, if any, they have to give to new clients.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s constantly something that comes up at our firm.  Thankfully, we can plan ahead for these things with the right people for the right job.  One idea is evaluate everyones&#8217; availability on certain accounts to determine what extra time, if any, they have to give to new clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodger D. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2008/04/will_you_kick_ass_for_us/comment-page-1#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodger D. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pr-squared.com/pr2wp/?p=496#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating post. And I love your social media news release and website templates. While we&#039;re not using all the features, we are using some.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating post. And I love your social media news release and website templates. While we&#8217;re not using all the features, we are using some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
