“If I Had A Million Dollars”

IStock_000005514845XSmallWhile at NewComm Forum last month, I attended Rohit Bhargava’s session on “The Future of Marketing & Advertising.”  During the Q&A I asked Rohit one of those classic, simple questions that tend to elicit surprising answers.

“What keeps you up at night?  What do you fear in this brave new world?”

Rohit’s answer – and I’m paraphrasing – boiled down to, “I’m afraid of what happens when a big corporation peels $1M from their advertising budget and hands it to me for a Social Media campaign.  The types of demands they’ll make regarding ROI for that kind of budget won’t be easily answered.”

With all due respect to Rohit, I don’t share this anxiety.  Forget about PR blacklisting for a second (it’s an insular issue amongst relatively tiny communities) and think about the stupid antics of those advertising agencies that have not figured out that Marketing has become a transparent, 2–way street.  Remember “All I Want for Xmas is a PSP” for example?  The PR industry gaffes have been stoopid, not fraudulent.  I think it’s high time that corporate marketers shaved those ad budgets in favor of grassroots Social Media concepts, where PR is the stronger partner.       

Heck, give me a million dollars – I double-dog-dare you – and we can talk about how we’ll use that money to generate more positive word-of-mouth for your company than any single advertising campaign could ever accomplish. 

With $1 million we can play the biggest game of smallball ever played.

Sure, we’ll cover the waterfront in terms of top-tier blogs, mainstream media and vertical channels. 

We’ll also be sure to appropriately reach-out to the B-Z list bloggers, too.  Thanks to tools like Radian6 we’ll know who’s talking about our client and related industry-level issues, and when & why, and can respond rapidly and transparently.

We’ll empower everyday users, too.  We can create a Flickr group that pays homage to their creativity by identifying images via related tags.  The best of those images might be highlighted on the corporate website.  We can create a YouTube channel where the million-dollar-client can speak forthrightly and in human terms about their news, events and mission and solicit video responses, too.

We’ll be on Twitter, of course, and using tools like Tweetscan and Tweetbeep to monitor conversations 24/7 – again, we’ll be monitoring not just for client references but for associated industry themes.

IStock_000005850387XSmallWe’ll train and empower a cadre of client employees to serve as community liaisons.  Think of this as “distributed PR.”  Some of these employee evangelists will be bloggers; most will be on Twitter too; the charismatic folks will be gifted with a Flip camera so they can vlog their thoughts.  These internal advocates will work hand-in-glove with the PR team.

Speaking of video – we’ll create a video production group, complete with mini studio rigged with an HD video camera, audio recording equipment, green screen, etc.  Thus equipped, we’ll produce weekly podcasts and vlogs with our million-dollar-client’s execs and other industry do-gooders.  If appropriate we’ll also create funky videos that might have some viral appeal.  Heck, we could “live-vlog” a major product announcement! 

I’m not generally a fan of creating branded social networks, but you can’t argue with the success of white-label solutions like Ning.  If our million-dollar-client served one or more niches that was prone to fandom, this would become a serious consideration.

SEO would play a role, but I’d be just as intrigued to explore Search Engine Marketing options, too.  How about testing out NewsAds – contextual Google ads based on industry and news-oriented keyword searches?

Oops – almost forgot – we’ll also want to create an RSS microsite as part of the Social Media Newsroom we’ll create.  This will aggregate all the blog posts about our million-dollar client in one feed.  As described by Marshall Kirkpatrick, “It’s like a news dashboard for anyone interested in seeing what’s being written about (the client).”

These are just the ideas that spewed out in the initial rush of pondering for our imaginary deep-pocketed client.  For an actual client – one where we’d have a sense of products, customer satisfaction, industry trends, etc. – we would get much more granular and creative.  (Just as Picasso started out as a fine classical artist before delving into Cubism, the Agency team would need to do a deep-dive into the million-dollar-client’s business before breaking out the disco ball of creativity.) 

Ultimately a big goal of any million-dollar program would be to make every stakeholder feel important through monitoring, response, and transparent, frequent outreach. 

Measurement?  Think about benchmarking the BEFORE and measuring IStock_000004106672XSmallthe AFTER of: web traffic, sales, online mentions (volume and tone), customer service inbound calls, media buzz, customer satisfaction index, etc.  It’s possible to measure – and would still be worthwhile even if it weren’t.

What Big Ideas would you add to the list?  What else would you measure?

Meanwhile, make your million-dollar check payable to …

Posted on: May 21, 2008 at 2:56 am By Todd Defren
22 Responses to ““If I Had A Million Dollars””

 

Comments
  • Aronado says:

    hola! Todd

    Great post! I think the real question is, how are we truly measuring ROI. I absolutely believe that the SM approach will yield a much greater (if done right of course) ROI over a longer period of time.

    That being said, come on Todd, don’t you have some graphs to show us some comparisons of Traditional vs SM over a specific period of time ? Of course, we can talk to clients about “inbound calls, media buzz, customer satisfaction index” all day long but, at the end of the day the CEO will want us to “reasonably” articulate how & what his tangible ROI will be.

    I look forward to your next post. I am ready to come and work on the $1,000,000 campaign with you ;) just give me a *flip* and I am in.

  • Lally says:

    Excellent post. And your hypothetical client most likely would be well served by every nugget of advice you offer.

    The frustrated energy of your post is all too familiar, because I know (as you do) that the client who comes to the world of relationship building by peeling a small bit from a bloated old-media budget has unrealistic expectations.

    They still will measure your results by old-media standards, which means weekly, monthly and quarterly demand.

    I AM NOT disagreeing with anything in your post. Too often, though, the person holding the purse strings wants to see numbers NOW.

    NOW is all about numbers.

    Brands are about relationships

    Numbers are so 1995.

    ;]

  • owen mack says:

    i’d open it up and include more off-line events…though i’d design them to be documented. one of the ideas that has stuck in my head the last few years came from a conversation i had with doug atkin about culting of brands: “members” of cult brands have lots of face to face interaction. and we all know most wom happens off-line right?

    and i’m glad to see your video production group idea!

    also on the social media newsroom tip: watch http://www.sonecast.net/ they’re going live in a few months with something you’ll like. no, i’m not affiliated but i’ve been talking to them.

  • Todd Defren says:

    Thanks, all, for the terrific and thoughtful comments.

    Seems like ROI is the big issue. I am curious: how much of the responsibility do you put on the CORPORATION to figure this part out?

  • Katie Paine says:

    What a great conversation this is! I think many of the commenters are missing your point, which was brilliant. The ROI measure will come from pre/post metrics of sales/market share or any other $$-based metric you want.

    You do an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation against the $ impact of a traditional campaign conducted the year before. Marketers do it all the time. Its just that PR people run screaming from the room when you start talking statistical analysis.

    However, I think what also will convince the CEO is demonstrated improvement in relationship scores on factors like credibility, trust, satisfaction, commitment, and control mutuality. Improvement in relationship scores leads to lower transaction costs, improved efficiencies, lower turnover and higher net return to shareholders.

    You can take that to the bank.

  • Randy says:

    Hi Todd

    Thanks for the interesting read. You want to know about how much the responsibility should be on the corporation to determine ROI?

    Coming from the client side, the “corporation” bears the responsibility of having their analytics established correctly from the starting point to accurately measure the results.

    However, you as the agency running this campaign, are ultimately on the hook because I, as the client, am on the hook to my superiors. It is my job to convince the higher-ups that using traditional ROI needs to be a part and not just the entire measure of success for a campaign of this nature. And it is your job to give me the information so I can make that argument.

    However, even if that argument is made successfully, shrewd businesses need to invest their money wisely in marketing campaigns to create not only buzz and conversations, but buzz that leads to sales.

    For a business whose success depends on not only positive buzz but increased sales (whether ad or product) and quarterly and yearly numbers (that’s what investors, VCs, and potential buyers look at, not buzz index) – the first programs to get cut are going to be the ones that don’t perform to the traditional metrics.

    You can have 1000 people follwing your Twitter, and 2000 images in your Flickr group, and 200,000 people who have installed your Facebook application – but if there is no bump in sales, your contract is not going to be renewed.

    Unless sales isn’t the goal of your client. And there are not many of those out there that survive very long.

  • Good post with lots of good information. I’m curious though – what is the type of product you’re talking about – is this B2C or B2B? I ask because I think the use of these tools differs by audience. What tools work for a smaller vendor in the B2B space? We’ve explored many of these but struggle to find the fit with an executive-level decision maker in a B2B environment. Appreciate your thoughts.

  • H&R Block says:

    Todd:

    If you would like to see what an extensive social media campaign looks like in practice, you should view some of the work that H&R Block has done in the space.

    The campaign is far-reaching with use of communities such as YouTube, SecondLife, Twitter, Facebook, our own branded community. The goal has been to engage consumers and move brand metrics. The pre and post measurement has been part of the rigor around these programs. Below are two links that highlight the program and can be an example that any brand can utilize social media (hey if we can make taxes engaging….)

    redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2008/04/sap-global-surv.html

    http://adage.com/article?article_id=127134

    cheers

  • H&R Block says:

    Todd:

    If you would like to see what an extensive social media campaign looks like in practice, you should view some of the work that H&R Block has done in the space.

    The campaign is far-reaching with use of communities such as YouTube, SecondLife, Twitter, Facebook, our own branded community. The goal has been to engage consumers and move brand metrics. The pre and post measurement has been part of the rigor around these programs. Below are two links that highlight the program and can be an example that any brand can utilize social media (hey if we can make taxes engaging….)

    redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2008/04/sap-global-surv.html

    http://adage.com/article?article_id=127134

    cheers

  • jonas says:

    Of course, you could just call FM.



logo




PostRank Topblogs 2009 - #3 in PR















View Todd Defren's profile on LinkedIn


Brink