We talk a whole lot about humanizing the corporation, but when we do so, we tend to think in terms of Customer Service and Marketing.  Is that all there is to it?

These questions came to mind during a recent dinner hosted by Jeff Dachis, former head of Razorfish and now founding father of Dachis Corp., which has attracted stars like Peter Kim and David Armano (whom I sat next to during the meal; the dude is not only smart but fairly hilarious).

Dachis Corp. is talking about “social business design” as its core concept: “the future of business lies in the intentional creation of a dynamic business culture that empowers all of its constituents to better exchange value.”

But this post is not about Dachis Corp. Although we jokingly asked him to, Jeff did not unroll a magic scroll to describe the Dachis Corp. vision or project list.  So these questions are being spurred by my own unsated curiosity about the future of corporate organization.

Think about a corporation that fully embraced Social Media WITHIN the four walls.

What will happen when a corporation is empowered to view which employees are the most prolific ideamakers, the most connected across hierarchies?

What happens when it’s discovered that “Josh, in Accounting,” has the most re-tweets by his co-workers?  Does this impact his performance review? Does it mean he’s best at finding valuable nuggets on the web, or that he is brilliant, or that he’s better suited to a different department?  Is Josh wasting time on the web — or is he more valuable than anyone realized?

What happens when a world-changing brainstorm happens, unbidden, thanks to a blog post published on the intranet by “Connie, in Customer Service?”  What happens if Connie decides to post about “tricks to decrease customer hold-times,” but also reveals that these tricks do nothing to boost customer satisfaction?  Is she going to be lauded for great thinking, or condemned for whistle-blowing?  Empowered to effect changes based on her observations — or fired?

What happens when “Linda, the Hot Girl from the Scranton office” realizes that she has the most internal Twitter/Yammer followers largely because of her racy avatar?  Can her employer suggest a more appropriate pic?  Can she sue for harassment  — for either reason?

What happens when the best ideas rise to the top regardless of authorship?  Will transparency lead to a more egalitarian meritocracy?  Will one-hit-wonders be detected more quickly?  Will “seniority” fade in importance?  Or will the current Powers-That-Be find ways to protect their fiefdoms? Will they become the offical “vetters” of these unrefined ideas?  Will they have the power to tamp down a bottom-up revolution in information sharing?

Forget for a moment about how to measure ROI of Social Media Marketing.  Think instead about how Social Media Thinking will impact the greater whole of the company.

A wild ride ahead, for Dachis Corp. and for us all.

Don’t get me wrong — we’ve been whacked by the recession.  And, more importantly, I am not sharing this cryptic bit of good news in order to brag.  Just the opposite.  I am trying to inspire you.

These victories have made us more bold.  We no longer feel the sense of inferiority that dogged us as a start-up agency.  We now know we’re as good as anyone.  Not necessarily better — but definitely just as good.  We deserve to be in the scrum.

But, so do you.  You see, we are no smarter than thee.  On any given day, we are not more creative, thoughtful, hard-working or more savvy than any other agency.  At meetups, tweetups and on Twitter; in the Comments section of my blog; and of course on other great blogs written by others, I meet folks every day who are brilliant, rigorous thinkers and doers.

They (you!) scare me.  They (you!) can beat me.  If I can win what I’m winning, they (you!) can win what I’m winning.

This applies even if you don’t work in the marcomm industry.  If there’s a competitor out there in your niche who’s having a good run of luck, don’t ascribe it to their size, their people, their practices, etc.  You can win what they win.  Try to scrap in the biggest sandbox you can find.

This is what I’ve learned as an entrepreneur.  Nobody’s better than you.  And you’re no better than anyone.  Just try harder, be nicer, and work your tail off trying to exceed the expectations of prospects and customers.

Go to bed exhausted.  Wake up exhilirated.

See you on the field.

Inevitably the talk turns to the state of Social Media in general, and its adoption (or lack thereof) within large corporations.

At this point in the conversations, opinions start to diverge.

Some thought leaders are encouraged to see that Corporate America is no longer ignoring Social Media, and look forward to seeing seismic changes happen – even if they occur incrementally.

Other brainiacs are discouraged because Social Media COULD (and maybe SHOULD) bring earth-shattering changes to the hidebound hierarchical thinking of corporations … but instead, they see Social Media being relegated to silo status: it’s being viewed as “a marketing thing,” akin to a media buy.

Meanwhile, some folks are simply ready to move on all together.  My pal Geoff Livingston exemplifies this thought process.  For Geoff, the shine is off the apple. As a dyed-in-the-wool early adopter, he’s looking for the Next Big Thing and is also a bit discouraged to see some of the hail-fellow-well-met camaraderie of yore give way to competitive professionalization in the space.  

Of course, on any given day, moods change.  On some days, these evangelists are all charged up to give that “Social Media 101” presentation for the umpteenth time … Other days? Not so much.  Let’s face it: evangelism is a slog.  Given the massive changes represented by the new modes of marketing, these early evangelists will probably need to present on “Social Media 101” topics for the next DECADE.  It’s an uphill climb. 

As for me?  I fall in the middle camp, but do skew towards optimism. 

I am not happy to see Social Media viewed as “a marketing thing,” but let’s face it, it ain’t a bad place to start — Social Media is primarily about having genuine & relevant dialogue with all stakeholders, and that’s historically been where PR/Marketing rule the roost.  (And, yea, that’s also the arena where I make my living.)

And, I think that if marketers do a good job of demonstrating how/why Social Media is positively impacting the corporation, overall acceptance of its tenets will allow the Social Media seed to grow into an unstoppable weed — one that finds its way into every crack in the hierarchy. 

That would be a good thing.  But it takes a while.

What if I told you that our clients at RealNetworks had all the necessary Social Media and User Interface epiphanies a couple of years ago, and worked diligently to make RealPlayer rock?

What if I told you that the new version (now in beta), launched this week, allows you to do some very cool stuff, like:

• download most any web video into a personal media library;
• share the video via social networks like Twitter and Facebook;
• convert the videos for on-the-go viewing on your iPhone, iPod, BlackBerry, etc.

Oh, and what if the “mainstream media” also lauded the new product?

Would you be willing to try it? Or would you tell me that Real’s reputation from YEARS ago is enough to forswear their products, even when the products are quite good?

Take a deep breath before you answer.  This goes beyond RealNetworks.

This goes to the heart of how one handles PR for a brand.  Brand = reputation.  PR strives to improve reputations.  When we crank at the flywheel of reputation, we need to account for what hath gone before.  Even in a world in which consumers are game for “second chances,” that acceptance comes warily.  There are no big, creative campaigns that cause global amnesia.

PR is about cultivation. Slow, steady, and hugely unsatisfying in the short-term, especially for troubled brands … but, it’s also incalculably important and effective in the long run.  Especially if you believe in second chances.

(Of course, I do wish you’d try the new RealPlayer and let me know if you like it or not. I have been using it for two years quite happily. Surely, as a marketing pro, you believe in second chances?)

Yesterday I spent a fair bit of time flogging for Alice on Twitter.  We have over 70 clients, and yet you have rarely seen me throw out more than a single tweet or two about them. 

What made Alice.com different?  They let me use it. 

Alice execs insisted that I sign up for the service as a beta user; asked me to enjoin my bride to take part in building the shopping list; followed-up to see how the sign-up process worked out for us — and then sent along the neatly-packed goodies.  Yea, it was just shampoo and such, but what I saw in my mind?  A professional and friendly service that promised fewer trips to the local Target store.

In my 17+ years in PR, I can count on one hand how many times a client made sure that the agency PR team personally used and enjoyed their product.  Granted, we do plenty of PR for enterprise software companies and other less-appropriate products, but the overall concept holds true:

When you are asking your PR agency to wow the mediasphere about your offering, wouldn’t it be better if that advocacy came from a genuine feeling of delight?

If you have the heart and stomach to watch it, this video of the death of a girl now popularly known as “Neda” — Farsi for the call — will not only haunt you forever, but will also tell you all you need to know about how the world is changing.

The filters are off. The collective is self-aware. The masses are the media. 

The “cluetrain” was too short-sighted a vision. It was too focused on corporate marketers.  That’s such an infinitesimal part of the real story.  The real cluetrain has wings; it’s flying right off the rails.

We’ve been programmed to accept the reality of mainstream editorial decisions.  As a society we have made decisions on matters of culture and war and breakfast cereal based on what “The Editors” have elected to show us. You won’t see Neda die — looking straight at you — on CNN.

While we have to thank the Powers That Be at YouTube for deciding to let Iran’s citizen footage stay online for their “documentary value,” I’d suggest that this unexpurgated content would still have found its way to us. I also think that the technical tricks that the rebellious Iranians are now popularizing could further erode censorship and “editorial policies” across all societies. 

In order to quell one riot, the police may use water cannons, shotguns, batons.  But how do you stop a countrywide riot?  When everyone in Iran sees a gang of police back down and run from a mob of protestors, why would anyone in Iran ever run way again? 

In a world in which Social Media exists, autocrats will need to resort to increasingly savage tactics to maintain order — knowing full well that these moves will be documented and surreptitiously broadcast after-the-fact: which in turn will threaten their legitimacy in the eyes of both their own citizens and the global community.  Social Media creates a (virtuous? viscious?) cycle: unstoppable transparency in an authoritarian society must lead to unconscionable cruelty, which must lead to revolution, which will lead to renewal.

The people are being reintroduced to each other, across oceans and cultures.  The cracks are showing.  We are recognizing our universality.  We are no longer so willing to be duped by those in power. 

It’s true in Social Media Marketing.  It’s true in Iran.

I don’t think I’ll ever be able to suggest that “Social Media is just one of many tools in the toolbox” again.  While that’s a defensible statement to a marketer maybe, ultimately Social Media as a cultural force is, truly, bigger than all that.

But if you’ve learned nothing else from this blog, you know it’s not just about the bloggers.  The seismic shift is about the people.  The just folks.  The average joes & janes.  They’re not all blogging.  In fact, most of ‘em are not blogging.

Meanwhile, Twitter and Facebook are growing like crazy.  There’s a good reason for it: the barriers to content creation are incredibly low.  The ease with which you can find and interact with like-minded contacts, including friends, is nearly miraculous.  As net pundit Clay Shirky pointed out in a recent speech: now, “the technology for publishing is the same technology used for consumption.”  And that makes all the difference.

That’s why more and more of our PR programs target not just mainstream media and bloggers but also “regular folks.”  The latter can be found in Facebook Groups, on Twitter, in message boards, etc.

In fact, we are developing a strategy this month for a major brand, and there is no call from the client to contact mainstream media … bloggers are important to the mix, but are just one aspect … the bulk of the work will be done along the furthest edges.  That’s what the CLIENT wants.

Think back 18 months ago, my fellow PR professional.  Were we writing PR proposals that targeted Joe Mouseclick?  Would our Big Name Client have been satisfied with a PR plan that had ZERO Media Relations aspects? No, we were “influencing the influencers” who influenced the masses.

But paraphrasing Shirky again, this is no longer about “professionals broadcasting media to amateurs.”  The amateurs are as important as the tastemakers.  We’re going “hypermicro.”

Scalability challenges? Huge. Exciting? Dangerous? Hard to measure? Definitely. Would I go back to Ye Olde & Simple Days of PR? NFW.

It was the brainchild of Doug Winfield, who until recently was a VP of Digital Strategies at Waggener Edstrom.

I don’t know how many other agencies Doug had used this approach with, but I was intrigued enough to reach out.  What had me most excited, thinking more broadly (i.e., beyond this one job applicant), was that Doug had created some Word of Mouth for himself, even within the small confines of our offices.  No less than 5 people showed me this advertisement.  That’s got to give a fellow an edge.

We’re not hiring at Doug’s level just now, but I hope to keep a dialogue going with him for down the road.  (If you want to beat me to the punch, you can reach out to him yourself.)

Anyway, I could not help but be intrigued by the niche-level of targeting powered by Facebook Ads.  While the service has been off to (more than one) rocky start, a well-orchestrated, non-spammy, highly targeted campaign is coming increasingly into the realm of possibility.

I predict big things and interesting times.

Here was my answer:

“Inbound Marketing is findability based on authority based on authenticity based on content based on passion.”

It’s a little goofy on first read, but think it through:

If you have passion, you will be inspired to create content.

If you have passion, your content will ring true; it will be authentic.

If you create authentic content with passion, you’ll soon be recognized as an authority in your arena.

This authority will cause others to frequently refer to your content, boosting your SEO, or findability.

This is the New Marketing.

How would you describe it in 1 sentence?

They are either Social Media Converts, looking for additional ammunition with which to convince upper management of the need to “go social,” or, the attendees are new to (or skeptical about) Social Media; they’re at the event to get a 1–day education on all this “Social Media stuff.”  These tirekickers were often sent by their bosses, as an advance scouting party.

Interestingly, most of these attendees, of both stripes, are “junior” or “middle” management.  While VPs of Marketing, CEOs and CMOs sometimes show up, more often it’s the folks in an organization’s middle tier who register.

I am musing aloud here.  I wonder what this means.  We are talking about fundamental changes in how-to think about Marketing, so you’d think that the CEO and CMO would be pretty darned curious?  That they would want firsthand experience with this earth-shaking and unstoppable trend?  Guess they are too busy!

I actually do trust that the middle managers who become converts will faithfully and effectively evangelize the benefits of Social Media, and will get pilot projects off the ground. 

But I also worry that the tirekickers who don’t have an epiphany at some conference will unduly and unfairly delay their corporation’s own forays into Social Media.